Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Banks - Regional
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Banks - Regional | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $210M | $1.69B | $2.64B | $6.91B | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $1.47B | $1.12B | $563M | $2.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $139M | $224M | $-62M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 91.1% | 90.0% | 71.0% | 77.4% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 12.4% | 25.5% | -14.9% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 13.7x | 11.5x | 63.4x | 109.7x |
| Total Debt | $498M | $42M | $1.12B | $19M | $1.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $304M | $216M | $668M | $77M | $960M |
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 209.7 | +109.7% |
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 109.7x)
YELP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage
- 14.1% ROA vs FROG's -4.7%, ROIC 25.1% vs -8.0%
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 2.2%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs IAC's 347.8%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- 20.0% margin vs FROG's -10.9%
FROG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.8%
- +65.0% vs ANGI's -65.4%
Among these 5 stocks, IAC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 109.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs FROG's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.0% vs ANGI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.1% ROA vs FROG's -4.7%, ROIC 25.1% vs -8.0% |
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories
YELP leads 1 • FROG leads 1 • TRMK leads 0 • IAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRMK and FROG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 4.0x FROG's $563M. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FROG's -10.9%. On growth, FROG holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.5B | $1.1B | $563M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | $236M | $323M | -$66M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $139M | $224M | -$62M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $281M | $230M | $151M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.1% | +90.0% | +71.0% | +77.4% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +12.4% | +25.5% | -14.9% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +9.5% | +20.0% | -10.9% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +19.1% | +20.7% | +26.9% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +0.8% | — | +25.8% | -25.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -163.3% | -16.7% | +5.4% | +56.3% | +64.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 56% valuation discount to YELP's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $1.7B | $2.6B | $6.9B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $404M | $1.5B | $3.1B | $6.9B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.57x | 12.71x | 12.13x | -91.97x | -32.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.10x | 13.74x | 11.50x | 63.45x | 109.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.50x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.22x | 6.18x | 9.49x | — | 14.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 1.15x | 2.36x | 12.99x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 2.61x | 1.28x | 7.47x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.62x | 5.23x | 11.39x | 48.56x | 71.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FROG. FROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANGI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs IAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +19.7% | +10.8% | -7.0% | +0.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +14.1% | +1.2% | -4.7% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +25.1% | +7.1% | -8.0% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +22.9% | +3.2% | -9.6% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.06x | 0.53x | 0.02x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $194M | -$174M | $448M | -$57M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $304M | $216M | $668M | $77M | $960M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $498M | $42M | $1.1B | $19M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.38x | — | 0.75x | — | 4.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FROG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FROG five years ago would be worth $15,879 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, FROG leads with a +65.0% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FROG at 38.5% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.6% | -5.7% | +15.5% | -4.3% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.4% | -19.9% | +32.5% | +65.0% | +22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.5% | +1.6% | +118.5% | +165.6% | -2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -27.9% | +47.6% | +58.8% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +10.2% | +127.7% | -12.0% | +347.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.1% | +0.5% | +29.8% | +38.5% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YELP and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANGI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 0.82x | 0.94x | 1.24x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.42 | $41.22 | $45.99 | $70.43 | $45.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.53 | $19.60 | $33.39 | $33.74 | $29.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.0% | +69.1% | +97.6% | +81.0% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 57.2 | 56.0 | 67.3 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M | 392K | 2.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANGI as "Hold", YELP as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", FROG as "Buy", IAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28). TRMK is the only dividend payer here at 2.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.75 | $28.33 | $45.50 | $68.71 | $49.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 67 | 9 | 22 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.97 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +70.7% | +17.3% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +9.8% |
ANGI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). YELP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ANGI vs YELP vs TRMK vs FROG vs IAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JFrog Ltd. (FROG) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Yelp Inc. at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 125% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 54% for Angi Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for JFrog Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FROG leads at 23. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus -13. 5% for JFrog Ltd. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus -15. 7% for FROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 103. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC?
In this comparison, TRMK (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ANGI, YELP, FROG, IAC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANGI or YELP or TRMK or FROG or IAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 2. 2% yield, +127. 7% 10Y return). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 7%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANGI and YELP and TRMK and FROG and IAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANGI (Communication Services) and YELP (Communication Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and FROG (Technology) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FROG is a small-cap high-growth stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TRMK pays a dividend while ANGI, YELP, FROG, IAC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.