Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Computer Hardware
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Computer Hardware | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $322M | $1.89B | $1.68B | $203M | $6.90B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $453M | $81M | $530M | $0.00 | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $-178M | $-103M | $-210M | $-506M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 57.9% | 94.4% | 7.8% | — | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | -53.5% | -140.4% | -19.3% | — | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.5x | — | — | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $224M | $18M | $55M | $72K | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $680M | $41M | $81M | $902M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Zai Lab Limited (ZLAB) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) | 100 | 360.9 | +260.9% |
| Canaan Inc. (CAN) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 147.6 | +47.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 221.2 | +121.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +5.5% vs ZLAB's -60.3%
ZLAB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
ZYME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 5.52x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 5.52x
- Beta 0.87 vs CAN's 4.24, lower leverage
CAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.7%, EPS growth 51.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 96.7% revenue growth vs ANL's -100.0%
In this particular matchup, IMVT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 27.8% margin vs ANL's -8.3%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.7% revenue growth vs ANL's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ANL's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs CAN's 4.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.5% vs ZLAB's -60.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • ANL leads 0 • ZLAB leads 0 • ZYME leads 0 • CAN leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ANL and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANL's -8.3%. On growth, CAN holds the edge at +121.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $453M | $81M | $530M | $0 | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$227M | -$118M | -$140M | -$532M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | -$178M | -$103M | -$210M | -$506M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | -$129M | -$45.7B | $0 | -$407M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +57.9% | +94.4% | +7.8% | — | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | -53.5% | -140.4% | -19.3% | — | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | -39.3% | -126.3% | -39.7% | — | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | -28.5% | -563.0% | — | — | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.5% | -91.1% | +121.1% | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.7% | -11.1% | -96.7% | +59.4% | -14.1% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $203M | $6.9B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $1.4B | $1.7B | $177M | $6.0B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.11x | -10.67x | -21.19x | -0.71x | -12.14x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.46x | — | — | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.11x | 15.89x | 0.38x | — | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 2.61x | 6.42x | 0.34x | 7.19x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-101 for ANL. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.3% | -24.3% | -0.2% | -60.7% | -68.2% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.2% | -15.5% | -0.1% | -34.6% | -62.2% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | -41.7% | -25.9% | -24.9% | — | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -103.8% | -27.2% | -27.3% | -29.7% | -68.3% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 0.31x | 0.07x | 0.13x | 0.00x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$34M | -$455M | -$23M | -$26M | -$902M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $680M | $41M | $81M | $902M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $224M | $18M | $55M | $72,000 | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.22x | -30.73x | -52.03x | -104.53x | — | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ANL and ZYME each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $680 for CAN. Over the past 12 months, ANL leads with a +545.0% total return vs ZLAB's -60.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZYME at 39.9% vs CAN's -47.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +647.8% | -1.5% | -14.0% | -58.4% | +29.8% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +545.0% | -60.3% | +74.7% | -54.4% | +110.9% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.2% | -38.2% | +173.7% | -85.7% | +55.0% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.2% | -90.0% | -39.7% | -93.2% | +213.0% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.2% | -38.9% | +76.0% | -92.2% | +237.9% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.7% | -14.8% | +39.9% | -47.7% | +15.7% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAN's 4.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs CAN's 14.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.15x | 0.87x | 4.24x | 1.66x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.25 | $44.34 | $29.75 | $2.22 | $36.27 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.88 | $15.96 | $11.51 | $0.31 | $14.32 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.8% | +38.5% | +76.9% | +14.4% | +92.7% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 43.4 | 36.7 | 30.1 | 57.9 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 380K | 842K | 584K | 9.7M | 1.9M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANL as "Buy", ZLAB as "Buy", ZYME as "Buy", CAN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 337.2% upside for CAN (target: $1) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $35.00 | $40.67 | $1.40 | $43.67 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 23 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ANL vs ZLAB vs ZYME vs CAN vs IMVT vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Canaan Inc.
(CAN) is the stronger pick with 96. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -93. 2% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CAN's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 24β — meaning CAN is approximately -2220% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canaan Inc.
(CAN) is pulling ahead at 96. 7% versus -100. 0% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adlai Nortye Ltd. grew EPS 68. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZLAB leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -833. 1% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -996. 4% for ANL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANL leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAN: 337. 2% to $1. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ANL, ZLAB, ZYME, CAN, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANL or ZLAB or ZYME or CAN or IMVT or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CAN: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANL and ZLAB and ZYME and CAN and IMVT and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANL (Healthcare) and ZLAB (Healthcare) and ZYME (Healthcare) and CAN (Technology) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; ZYME is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while ANL, ZLAB, ZYME, CAN, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.