Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANTA
Antalpha Platform Holding Company

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.-23.2%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-10.1%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+198.8%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.58B
5Y Perf.+62.0%

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANTA logoANTA
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
CLSK logoCLSK
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$231M$4.83B$9.14B$3.58B
Revenue (TTM)$47M$907M$647M$785M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$-1.31B$-867M$-261M
Gross Margin37.8%-47.7%-15.6%41.4%
Operating Margin6.7%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%
Forward P/E24.4x12.5x
Total Debt$410M$3.65B$280M$824M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$547M$234M$43M

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANTA
MARA
RIOT
CLSK
StockMay 25May 26Return
Antalpha Platform H… (ANTA)10076.8-23.2%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10089.9-10.1%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100298.8+198.8%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100162.0+62.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ANTA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CleanSpark, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. RIOT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ANTA
Antalpha Platform Holding Company
The Banking Pick

ANTA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 321.0%, EPS growth 165.5%
  • -23.9% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.63, current ratio 1.05x
  • Beta 1.63, current ratio 1.05x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
  • +207.5% vs ANTA's -23.9%
Best for: income & stability
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Value Play

CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANTA logoANTA321.0% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
ValueCLSK logoCLSKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsANTA logoANTA9.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyANTA logoANTABeta 1.63 vs RIOT's 3.87
DividendsCLSK logoCLSK0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+207.5% vs ANTA's -23.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ANTA logoANTA0.2% ROA vs RIOT's -21.5%, ROIC 0.6% vs -8.7%

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ANTAAntalpha Platform Holding Company

Segment breakdown not available.

MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLANTALAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ANTA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 19.1x ANTA's $47M. ANTA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$47M$907M$647M$785M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M$627M-$450M$181M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M-$1.3B-$867M-$261M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$829,499-$312M-$1.0B-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.8%-47.7%-15.6%+41.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.7%-90.6%-61.8%-26.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.3%-144.6%-102.4%-33.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-25.0%-34.4%-119.6%-133.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.3%-4.8%-60.0%-2.6%
ANTA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 12.5x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 76% valuation discount to ANTA's 51.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ANTA's 158.2x.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$231M$4.8B$9.1B$3.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$635M$7.9B$9.2B$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.26x-3.44x-12.36x12.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.35x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple158.25x6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.86x5.32x14.12x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.85x1.30x2.87x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ANTA and RIOT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ANTA delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANTA's 8.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANTA scores 7/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.1%-30.5%-28.8%-13.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%-17.1%-21.5%-8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%-9.0%-8.7%+10.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.0%-12.1%-11.0%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97335
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage8.84x1.05x0.10x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$404M$3.1B$46M$781M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$547M$234M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$410M$3.6B$280M$824M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.73x-16.47x-18.49x
Evenly matched — ANTA and RIOT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANTA five years ago would be worth $7,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,054 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs ANTA's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 48.8% vs ANTA's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.7%+28.2%+70.3%+21.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-23.9%-4.7%+207.5%+74.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-23.9%+36.1%+129.8%+229.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-23.9%-59.5%-27.8%-26.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-23.9%-51.6%+787.3%-84.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.7%+10.8%+32.0%+48.8%
RIOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ANTA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ANTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ANTA's 35.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.63x3.11x3.87x3.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.72$23.45$24.14$23.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.25$6.66$7.68$7.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.1%+54.2%+99.9%+59.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.369.674.571.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K47.6M18.4M19.0M
Evenly matched — ANTA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ANTA as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricANTA logoANTAAntalpha Platform…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.13$27.90$20.21
# AnalystsCovering analysts1191810
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%+0.0%+4.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ANTA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CLSK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAntalpha Platform Holding C… (ANTA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANTA vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the stronger pick with 321.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Antalpha Platform Holding Company at 51. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

Over the past 5 years, Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) delivered a total return of -23.

9%, compared to -59. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

63β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 138% more volatile than ANTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 9% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is pulling ahead at 321.

0% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 44.

6% to $20. 21.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK?

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. ANTA, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ANTA or MARA or RIOT or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ANTA and MARA and RIOT and CLSK?

These companies operate in different sectors (ANTA (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ANTA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 160%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ANTA and MARA and RIOT and CLSK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ANTA: 321.0% · MARA: 38.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.