Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $130M | $165M | $896.00B | $355.61B | $7.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $55M | $280.33B | $49.28B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $15M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% | 60.0% | 61.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.7% | 25.9% | 29.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 14.4x | 25.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M | $942.38B | $45.49B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $40M | $343.34B | $10.27B | $357M |
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AN2 Therapeutics, I… (ANTX) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| Spero Therapeutics,… (SPRO) | 100 | 32.8 | -67.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 235.3 | +135.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 6.87x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 6.87x
- 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55
SPRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 111.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 27.8% margin vs PRAX's 2.4%
- 25.0% ROA vs ANTX's -47.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs -61.1%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Better valuation composite
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +491.9% vs SPRO's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs SPRO's -1.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 25.0% ROA vs ANTX's -47.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs -61.1% |
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPRO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • ANTX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. SPRO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $55M | $280.3B | $49.3B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $14M | $81.4B | $15.5B | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $15M | $57.0B | $13.7B | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $7M | $100.9B | $12.6B | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% | +60.0% | +61.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +24.7% | +25.9% | +29.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +20.4% | +27.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +13.2% | +36.0% | +25.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -95.6% | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | +48.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130M | $165M | $896.0B | $355.6B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $110M | $128M | $1.50T | $390.8B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.09x | 19.00x | 16.00x | 27.18x | -19.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.25x | 14.40x | 25.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | 2.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x | 26.39x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.77x | 3.20x | 7.42x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 2.85x | 2.47x | 10.40x | 6.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | 67.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-52 for ANTX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs ANTX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.3% | +35.6% | +15.9% | +41.1% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +25.0% | +1.3% | +13.1% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.1% | -0.2% | +4.5% | +15.8% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.4% | -0.0% | +8.9% | +17.3% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$37M | $599.0B | $35.2B | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $40M | $343.3B | $10.3B | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M | $942.4B | $45.5B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.74x | 10.70x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,816 for SPRO. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs SPRO's -1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ANTX's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +327.0% | +21.3% | -0.5% | +20.3% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +319.5% | -1.4% | +21.8% | +17.2% | +491.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | +62.9% | +138.2% | +47.0% | +1757.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | -81.8% | +118.2% | +65.6% | -14.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.4% | -75.2% | +465.8% | +121.1% | -36.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | +17.7% | +33.6% | +13.7% | +164.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ANTX's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.26x | 0.94x | -0.20x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.91 | $3.22 | $337.25 | $84.04 | $366.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $1.80 | $262.71 | $65.35 | $37.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.6% | +88.5% | +95.1% | +98.3% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 49.6 | 59.1 | 60.6 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 261K | 641K | 7.0M | 12.7M | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANTX as "Buy", SPRO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | $339.75 | $86.13 | $607.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 | 61 | 48 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 56 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). SPRO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
ANTX vs SPRO vs JPM vs KO vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. (ANTX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -81. 8% for Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SPRO's -75. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately -875% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spero Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 111. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPRO leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -0. 0% for SPRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPRO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ANTX, SPRO, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANTX or SPRO or JPM or KO or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANTX and SPRO and JPM and KO and PRAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANTX (Healthcare) and SPRO (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPRO is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while ANTX, SPRO, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.