Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $130M | $165M | $7.70B | $276M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $55M | $0.00 | $69M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $15M | $-327M | $-62M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% | — | 98.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.7% | — | -87.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | — | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M | $110K | $201M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $40M | $357M | $32M | $10.27B |
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AN2 Therapeutics, I… (ANTX) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| Spero Therapeutics,… (SPRO) | 100 | 32.8 | -67.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| Enanta Pharmaceutic… (ENTA) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.42
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 6.87x
- 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55
SPRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 111.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 7.59x
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 25.3x)
- 27.8% margin vs ENTA's -89.6%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +491.9% vs SPRO's -1.4%
Among these 5 stocks, ENTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -36.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 189.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ENTA's -89.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +491.9% vs SPRO's -1.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 25.0% ROA vs ANTX's -47.3%, ROIC -0.2% vs -61.1% |
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPRO leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • ANTX leads 0 • ENTA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SPRO and ENTA and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. SPRO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENTA's -89.6%. On growth, ENTA holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $55M | $0 | $69M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $14M | -$357M | -$55M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $15M | -$327M | -$62M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $7M | -$283M | -$10M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% | — | +98.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +24.7% | — | -87.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | — | -89.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +13.2% | — | -13.9% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -95.6% | — | +15.0% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | +48.0% | +2.7% | +57.5% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SPRO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, SPRO trades at a 30% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130M | $165M | $7.7B | $276M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $110M | $128M | $7.3B | $445M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.09x | 19.00x | -19.77x | -3.10x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.25x | — | — | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.77x | — | 4.23x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 2.85x | 6.83x | 3.92x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-64 for ENTA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTA's 3.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs ANTX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.3% | +35.6% | -43.0% | -64.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +25.0% | -40.2% | -20.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.1% | -0.2% | -65.0% | -23.2% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.4% | -0.0% | -49.3% | -31.0% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.00x | 3.11x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$37M | -$357M | $169M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $40M | $357M | $32M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M | $110,000 | $201M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -5.15x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,816 for SPRO. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs SPRO's -1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ENTA's -22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +327.0% | +21.3% | -6.9% | -17.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +319.5% | -1.4% | +491.9% | +60.6% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.4% | +62.9% | +1757.4% | -53.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.2% | -81.8% | -14.2% | -75.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.4% | -75.2% | -36.1% | -48.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | +17.7% | +164.8% | -22.5% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ANTX's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.26x | 1.55x | 1.27x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.91 | $3.22 | $366.52 | $17.15 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $1.80 | $37.19 | $6.44 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.6% | +88.5% | +72.7% | +69.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 49.6 | 31.9 | 35.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 261K | 641K | 396K | 169K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANTX as "Buy", SPRO as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ENTA as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 305.0% upside for ENTA (target: $48) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | $607.15 | $48.20 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). SPRO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ANTX vs SPRO vs PRAX vs ENTA vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AN2 Therapeutics, Inc. (ANTX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
On trailing P/E, Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -81. 8% for Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (SPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus SPRO's -75. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately -875% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spero Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 111. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPRO leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -125. 4% for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -130. 7% for ENTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPRO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
(SPRO) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENTA: 305. 0% to $48. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ANTX, SPRO, PRAX, ENTA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANTX or SPRO or PRAX or ENTA or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANTX and SPRO and PRAX and ENTA and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ANTX (Healthcare) and SPRO (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and ENTA (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ANTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPRO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while ANTX, SPRO, PRAX, ENTA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.