Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
APA vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
APA vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $13.54B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.92B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.43B | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.9% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.81B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $10.68B |
APA vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| APA Corporation (APA) | 100 | 355.0 | +255.0% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APA vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 15.0x)
- 16.1% margin vs XOM's 8.9%
- +149.8% vs XOM's +45.7%
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 107.4% 10Y total return vs APA's -13.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.5% revenue growth vs APA's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 68.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs APA's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.8% vs XOM's +45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs XOM's 6.4%, ROIC 17.8% vs 8.6% |
APA vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APA vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 36.3x APA's $8.9B. APA is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.9B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.2B | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.6% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.7% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
APA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, APA trades at a 57% valuation discount to XOM's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APA's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.5B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.8B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.60x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.95x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.38x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.61x | 26.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APA delivers a 21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APA's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APA scores 5/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.1% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.3B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.52x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,838 for APA. Over the past 12 months, APA leads with a +149.8% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.7% vs APA's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.0% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.8% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.8% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APA's -0.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.66 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.20 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.9% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.0M | 18.8M |
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates APA as "Hold" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -15.2% for APA (target: $32). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.69% vs APA's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.46 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +3.2% |
APA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
APA vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APA or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for APA Corporation (APA). APA Corporation (APA) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate APA Corporation (APA) a "Hold" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APA or XOM?
On trailing P/E, APA Corporation (APA) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, APA Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APA or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.
8%, compared to +98. 4% for APA Corporation (APA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus APA's -13. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APA or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus APA Corporation's -0. 02β — meaning APA is approximately -86% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 69% for APA Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APA or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -8. 4% for APA Corporation (APA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: APA Corporation grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APA or XOM?
APA Corporation (APA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
1% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APA leads at 30. 8% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APA leads at 37. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APA or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, APA Corporation (APA) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — APA or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 6% for APA Corporation (APA).
09Is APA or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, APA: -13. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APA and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.