Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $5.68B | $2.65B | $74.28B | $2.22B | $146.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $14.92B | $158M | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $-2M | $4.42B | $-107M | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 84.5% | 89.1% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | 24.3% | -80.8% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 106.5x | 15.5x | — | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $6M | $2.71B | $3M | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $43M | $3.12B | $197M | $1.14B |
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apogee Therapeutics… (APGE) | 100 | 388.0 | +288.0% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 96.4 | -3.6% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 161.9 | +61.9% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APGE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 291.1% 10Y total return vs REGN's 91.6%
- 100.8% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
REGN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
- 11.1% ROA vs APGE's -30.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -31.3%
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.25 vs ARQT's 1.50, lower leverage
- +218.5% vs PFE's +21.1%
PFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 6.7%
- Beta 0.49, yield 6.7%, current ratio 1.16x
- Better valuation composite
- 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.8% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs ARQT's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +218.5% vs PFE's +21.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs APGE's -30.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -31.3% |
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFE leads 2 • APGE leads 1 • DAWN leads 1 • ARQT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and APGE operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAWN's -67.8%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $14.9B | $158M | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$284M | $6M | $4.2B | -$124M | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | -$2M | $4.4B | -$107M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$233M | $27M | $4.2B | -$108M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +84.5% | +89.1% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | +24.3% | -80.8% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | +29.6% | -67.8% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | +27.9% | -68.0% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +19.0% | +83.9% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | +55.0% | -7.2% | +70.0% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 9% valuation discount to PFE's 18.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $2.6B | $74.3B | $2.2B | $146.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $2.6B | $73.9B | $2.0B | $212.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.68x | -162.85x | 17.23x | -20.70x | 18.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 106.49x | 15.46x | — | 8.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.72x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.92x | — | 10.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.04x | 5.18x | 14.06x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.58x | 14.22x | 2.48x | 5.05x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.20x | — | 16.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-32 for APGE. DAWN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs DAWN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.6% | -1.4% | +14.3% | -23.4% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.3% | -0.6% | +11.1% | -20.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.3% | -5.2% | +8.9% | -30.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.9% | -4.3% | +10.2% | -26.7% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.09x | 0.01x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | -$37M | -$412M | -$194M | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $43M | $3.1B | $197M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $6M | $2.7B | $3M | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | 108.44x | — | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APGE five years ago would be worth $39,110 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,504 for ARQT. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +218.5% total return vs PFE's +21.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APGE at 57.6% vs PFE's -6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | -27.0% | -7.8% | +143.3% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +119.6% | +56.6% | +31.2% | +218.5% | +21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.1% | +48.5% | -4.4% | +65.1% | -19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.1% | -35.0% | +43.2% | -8.4% | -14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.1% | -2.9% | +91.6% | -8.4% | +28.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.6% | +14.1% | -1.5% | +18.2% | -6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.50x | 0.77x | 0.25x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.31 | $31.77 | $821.11 | $21.53 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.34 | $12.72 | $476.49 | $5.64 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +66.6% | +87.1% | +100.0% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 34.8 | 41.7 | 80.3 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 868K | 1.3M | 626K | 5.0M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APGE as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 67.7% upside for ARQT (target: $36) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.44 | $35.50 | $865.68 | $21.50 | $27.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 | 48 | 12 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
APGE vs ARQT vs REGN vs DAWN vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apogee Therapeutics, Inc. (APGE) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Pfizer Inc. at 18. 9x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Apogee Therapeutics, Inc.
(APGE) delivered a total return of +291. 1%, compared to -35. 0% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APGE returned +291. 1% versus DAWN's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning ARQT is approximately 490% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (DAWN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -27. 9% for Apogee Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 106. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 97. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 67. 7% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
7% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. APGE, ARQT, DAWN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APGE or ARQT or REGN or DAWN or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +28. 5%, ARQT: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APGE and ARQT and REGN and DAWN and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. PFE pays a dividend while APGE, ARQT, REGN, DAWN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.