Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
APPF vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
APPF vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $6.02B | $83.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $995M | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $152M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $71M | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $107M | $1.47B |
APPF vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APPF vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs AMT's 114.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 26.6% margin vs APPF's 15.3%
- 3.7% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -16.4% vs APPF's -21.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs AMT's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.6x vs 27.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs APPF's 15.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (13.2% vs 434.2%) | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.4% vs APPF's -21.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs AMT's 4.5%, ROIC 22.4% vs 6.9% |
APPF vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APPF vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 10.9x APPF's $995M. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APPF's 15.3%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $995M | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $192M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $152M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.2% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.4% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 22% valuation discount to APPF's 43.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMT's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPF's 34.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.0B | $83.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $127.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.09x | 33.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.56x | 27.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.06x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.33x | 7.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.19x | 8.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.18x | 22.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $27 for AMT. APPF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs APPF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.2% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.4% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.9% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $107M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71M | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $12,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,668 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, AMT leads with a -16.4% total return vs APPF's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 6.6% vs AMT's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.4% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.6% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.3% | +3.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1247.1% | +114.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.6% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APPF's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMT currently trades 76.9% from its 52-week high vs APPF's 51.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $326.04 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $142.72 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.3% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 350K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates APPF as "Buy" and AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.6% upside for APPF (target: $237) vs 20.1% for AMT (target: $216). AMT is the only dividend payer here at 3.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $236.67 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.4% |
AMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). APPF leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
APPF vs AMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APPF or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APPF or AMT?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
4x versus AppFolio, Inc. at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, AppFolio, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APPF or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -13. 3% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1247% versus AMT's +114. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APPF or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus AppFolio, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning APPF is approximately -1987% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APPF or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APPF or AMT?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 14. 8% for AppFolio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 16. 1% for APPF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APPF or AMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) trades at 24. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for American Tower Corporation — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPF: 41. 6% to $236. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — APPF or AMT?
In this comparison, AMT (3.
7% yield) pays a dividend. APPF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APPF or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, APPF: +1247%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APPF and AMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (APPF (Technology) and AMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. AMT pays a dividend while APPF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.