Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Packaged Foods
Food Distribution
Packaged Foods
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Grocery Stores | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $4M | $7.79B | $75M | $34.69B | $1.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $8.90B | $1.51B | $83.57B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.22B | $507M | $-544M | $1.74B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.0% | 20.0% | 18.5% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.6% | -31.8% | 3.6% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x | — | 15.8x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.94B | $779M | $14.49B | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $501K | $257M | $54M | $1.07B | $98M |
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AquaBounty Technolo… (AQB) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 329.6 | +229.6% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 72.0 | -28.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AQB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 100.0% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
- +36.8% vs SMPL's -65.8%
SFM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 210.8% 10Y total return vs SYY's 81.3%
- Beta 0.16 vs HAIN's 2.19, lower leverage
- 12.5% ROA vs AQB's -47.3%, ROIC 17.8% vs -30.1%
Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs SFM's 0.88
- 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
SMPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 3.64x
- Better valuation composite
- 6.3% margin vs HAIN's -36.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs HAIN's 2.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.8% vs SMPL's -65.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs AQB's -47.3%, ROIC 17.8% vs -30.1% |
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFM leads 2 • SYY leads 1 • AQB leads 0 • HAIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY and AQB operate at a comparable scale, with $83.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, SYY holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $8.9B | $1.5B | $83.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$926M | $996M | -$430M | $4.0B | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.2B | $507M | -$544M | $1.7B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4.2B | $361M | $5M | $2.0B | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.0% | +20.0% | +18.5% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.6% | -31.8% | +3.6% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +5.7% | -36.1% | +2.1% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.1% | +0.3% | +2.4% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.1% | -6.7% | +4.7% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -5.5% | -11.3% | -13.4% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 38% valuation discount to SYY's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.35x vs SFM's 0.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $7.8B | $75M | $34.7B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $9.5B | $800M | $48.1B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 15.60x | -0.11x | 19.42x | 12.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.85x | — | 15.78x | 7.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.92x | — | 0.35x | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.52x | — | 11.53x | 5.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.88x | 0.05x | 0.43x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.83x | 0.13x | 19.11x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.65x | — | 19.48x | 7.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AQB. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFM scores 5/9 vs AQB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +36.1% | -164.7% | +80.7% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +12.5% | -36.8% | +6.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +17.8% | -23.7% | +15.7% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.3% | +22.1% | -29.2% | +19.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.39x | 1.64x | 7.81x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $1.7B | $725M | $13.4B | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $501,295 | $257M | $54M | $1.1B | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $1.9B | $779M | $14.5B | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.01x | 254.65x | -8.60x | 4.35x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SFM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $30,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for AQB. Over the past 12 months, AQB leads with a +36.8% total return vs SMPL's -65.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFM at 32.2% vs HAIN's -66.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +2.7% | -37.1% | +1.2% | -37.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.8% | -47.6% | -57.1% | +4.2% | -65.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +130.9% | -96.3% | +3.4% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +207.7% | -98.4% | -3.7% | -64.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +210.8% | -98.6% | +81.3% | +2.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.6% | +32.2% | -66.5% | +1.1% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFM and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SFM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYY currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.16x | 2.19x | 0.46x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $182.00 | $2.22 | $91.69 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $64.75 | $0.55 | $68.19 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.9% | +45.5% | +29.7% | +79.0% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 60.4 | 47.0 | 40.3 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 2.2M | 1.2M | 4.7M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SFM as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold", SYY as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.3% upside for HAIN (target: $1) vs 9.9% for SFM (target: $91). SYY is the only dividend payer here at 2.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $91.00 | $1.17 | $90.44 | $18.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 | 44 | 30 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 37 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.1% | +1.9% | +3.6% | +4.2% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SFM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AQB vs SFM vs HAIN vs SYY vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
0x versus Sysco Corporation at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +207. 7%, compared to -99. 1% for AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (AQB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFM returned +210. 8% versus AQB's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 19β — meaning HAIN is approximately 1276% more volatile than SFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 87. 7% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for Sysco Corporation — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAIN: 77. 3% to $1. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AQB, SFM, HAIN, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AQB or SFM or HAIN or SYY or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), 2. 8% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +81. 3%, HAIN: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AQB and SFM and HAIN and SYY and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AQB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. SYY pays a dividend while AQB, SFM, HAIN, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.