Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARAY vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
ARAY vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $35M | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $429M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $176M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57M | $2.22B |
ARAY vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuray Incorporated (ARAY) | 100 | 14.0 | -86.0% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARAY vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARAY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 90.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs ARAY's -94.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs ARAY's 2.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs ARAY's -10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ARAY's 2.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.8% vs ARAY's -78.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs ARAY's -10.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.0% |
ARAY vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARAY vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 82.8x ARAY's $429M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARAY's -10.8%. On growth, MDT holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $429M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.8% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARAY leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARAY's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MDT's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $154M | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.91x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.99x | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-77 for ARAY. MDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARAY's 2.17x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -77.5% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.1% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.17x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $176M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.86x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDT five years ago would be worth $7,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $606 for ARAY. Over the past 12 months, MDT leads with a -2.8% total return vs ARAY's -78.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDT at -1.4% vs ARAY's -56.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.5% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.4% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARAY's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDT currently trades 73.3% from its 52-week high vs ARAY's 14.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.10 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.0% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ARAY vs MDT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARAY or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger pick with 3.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Accuray Incorporated (ARAY). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Medtronic plc (MDT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ARAY or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Medtronic plc (MDT) delivered a total return of -27.
7%, compared to -93. 9% for Accuray Incorporated (ARAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDT returned +26. 5% versus ARAY's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ARAY or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Accuray Incorporated's 2. 42β — meaning ARAY is approximately 419% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medtronic plc (MDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 2% for Accuray Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ARAY or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medtronic plc (MDT) is pulling ahead at 3.
6% versus 2. 7% for Accuray Incorporated (ARAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Accuray Incorporated grew EPS 90. 3% year-over-year, compared to 30. 8% for Medtronic plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARAY leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ARAY or MDT?
Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -0. 3% for Accuray Incorporated — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus 1. 7% for ARAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDT leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ARAY or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ARAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ARAY or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 3. 6% yield). Accuray Incorporated (ARAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +26. 5%, ARAY: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ARAY and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while ARAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.