Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ARCB vs CHRW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
ARCB vs CHRW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $20.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.04B | $16.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | 4.1% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.6x | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $669M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $161M |
ARCB vs CHRW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 543.9 | +443.9% |
| C.H. Robinson World… (CHRW) | 100 | 211.2 | +111.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCB vs CHRW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth -64.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.3%
- 6.3% 10Y total return vs CHRW's 163.6%
- -4.0% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4%
CHRW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 88.3%, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.53x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% revenue growth vs CHRW's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.6x vs 27.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs ARCB's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs ARCB's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ARCB's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.5% vs CHRW's +98.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs ARCB's 2.3%, ROIC 18.0% vs 3.9% |
ARCB vs CHRW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARCB vs CHRW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHRW is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 4.0x ARCB's $4.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.7% (CHRW) to 1.4% (ARCB). On growth, ARCB holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $16.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $217M | $896M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $169M | $858M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -138.5% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.5x trailing earnings, CHRW trades at a 24% valuation discount to ARCB's 46.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARCB's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHRW's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $21.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.48x | 35.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.61x | 27.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.59x | 24.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 11.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.78x | 22.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHRW delivers a 33.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $4 for ARCB. ARCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHRW's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHRW scores 7/9 vs ARCB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +33.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +25.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $567M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $669M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.58x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ARCB and CHRW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHRW five years ago would be worth $18,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,711 for ARCB. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +107.5% total return vs CHRW's +98.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHRW at 20.2% vs ARCB's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.0% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +107.5% | +98.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +627.8% | +163.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARCB and CHRW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHRW is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCB's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCB currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs CHRW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $135.10 | $203.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.16 | $86.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 307K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
CHRW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ARCB as "Buy" and CHRW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.3% upside for CHRW (target: $187) vs -3.8% for ARCB (target: $117). For income investors, CHRW offers the higher dividend yield at 1.45% vs ARCB's 0.39%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.14 | $187.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $2.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +1.7% |
CHRW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ARCB vs CHRW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCB or CHRW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) is the stronger pick with -4.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the better valuation at 35. 5x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARCB or CHRW?
On trailing P/E, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the cheapest at 35. 5x versus ArcBest Corporation at 46. 5x. On forward P/E, ArcBest Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARCB or CHRW?
Over the past 5 years, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to +37. 1% for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCB returned +627. 8% versus CHRW's +163. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARCB or CHRW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus ArcBest Corporation's 1. 90β — meaning ARCB is approximately 100% more volatile than CHRW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 88% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARCB or CHRW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) is pulling ahead at -4.
0% versus -8. 4% for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 25. 1% year-over-year, compared to -64. 1% for ArcBest Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARCB leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARCB or CHRW?
C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 1. 5% for ArcBest Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHRW leads at 4. 9% versus 2. 3% for ARCB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHRW leads at 8. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARCB or CHRW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) trades at 23.
6x forward P/E versus 27. 9x for C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHRW: 9. 3% to $187. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARCB or CHRW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 4% for ArcBest Corporation (ARCB).
09Is ARCB or CHRW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C.
H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 4% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHRW: +163. 6%, ARCB: +627. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARCB and CHRW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CHRW pays a dividend while ARCB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.