Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AREB vs BUD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
AREB vs BUD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $90.00 | $137.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $119.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $12.57B |
| Gross Margin | -2.1% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | -155.0% | 31.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $72.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148K | $11.17B |
AREB vs BUD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Rebel Hold… (AREB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AREB vs BUD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AREB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -16.6%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
BUD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.6%
- -23.9% 10Y total return vs AREB's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 81.4%, current ratio 0.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs AREB's -16.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs AREB's -360.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs AREB's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.2% vs AREB's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs -235.6% |
AREB vs BUD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AREB vs BUD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUD is the larger business by revenue, generating $119.8B annually — 12583.6x AREB's $10M. BUD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AREB's -3.6%. On growth, AREB holds the edge at +28.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $119.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $12.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $32.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | +31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -150.8% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.5% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | +32.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AREB leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90 | $137.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $198.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 27.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BUD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BUD delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AREB. AREB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BUD's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs AREB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.8% | +13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -155.5% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $61.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147,586 | $11.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $72.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.58x | 2.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BUD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BUD five years ago would be worth $11,300 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AREB. Over the past 12 months, BUD leads with a +21.2% total return vs AREB's -100.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -100.0% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +13.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -23.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
BUD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BUD is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREB's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs AREB's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127200.00 | $82.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.07 | $56.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.8 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BUD is the only dividend payer here at 1.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $89.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
BUD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AREB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AREB vs BUD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREB or BUD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the stronger pick with 0.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AREB or BUD?
Over the past 5 years, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) delivered a total return of +13.
0%, compared to -100. 0% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BUD returned -23. 9% versus AREB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AREB or BUD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus American Rebel Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning AREB is approximately 275% more volatile than BUD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 81% for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AREB or BUD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is pulling ahead at 0.
7% versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Rebel Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to 10. 0% for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. Over a 3-year CAGR, AREB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AREB or BUD?
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
8% net margin versus -360. 5% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUD leads at 25. 9% versus -155. 0% for AREB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AREB or BUD?
In this comparison, BUD (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AREB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is AREB or BUD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BUD: -23. 9%, AREB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AREB and BUD?
These companies operate in different sectors (AREB (Consumer Cyclical) and BUD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BUD pays a dividend while AREB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare BUD vs TAP
TAP is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BUD.
Compare AREB vs STZ
STZ overlaps with AREB in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With TAP + SAM
TAP and SAM are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.