Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $123.00 | $136M | $1.64B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $0.00 | $66M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-79M | $-423M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | -2.1% | — | 82.1% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | -155.0% | — | -7.2% | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2M | $62M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148K | $28M | $89M | $222M |
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Rebel Hold… (AREB) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Corbus Pharmaceutic… (CRBP) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AREB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.05
- Beta 1.05 vs RCUS's 1.95
CRBP is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 3.3% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
AGIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -161.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 11.46x
- 48.0% revenue growth vs CRBP's -98.4%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs AGIO's -42.2%
- +209.6% vs AREB's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% revenue growth vs CRBP's -98.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs AREB's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -31.7% ROA vs AREB's -155.5%, ROIC -26.3% vs -235.6% |
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AREB leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGIO leads 1 • RCUS leads 1 • CRBP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AREB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and CRBP operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -156.4% (RCUS) to -6.4% (AGIO). On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $0 | $66M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$84M | -$470M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$79M | -$423M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$64M | -$385M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | — | +82.1% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -155.0% | — | -7.2% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | — | -6.4% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -150.8% | — | -5.8% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.5% | — | +137.7% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.6% | -60.3% | -9.0% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
AREB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123 | $136M | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $109M | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -1.84x | -3.87x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | — | 30.30x | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.98x | 1.34x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGIO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGIO delivers a -34.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-34 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AREB. CRBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AREB's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AREB scores 2/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.8% | -65.8% | -34.1% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -155.5% | -57.9% | -31.7% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | -51.4% | -26.3% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.4% | -58.5% | -33.8% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$27M | -$27M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147,586 | $28M | $89M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2M | $62M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.58x | — | — | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCUS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AREB. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs AREB's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCUS at 7.7% vs CRBP's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -100.0% | +38.1% | +1.3% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +77.3% | -2.4% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +7.3% | +8.3% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -78.0% | -50.7% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -85.4% | -42.2% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +2.4% | +2.7% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AREB and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AREB is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs AREB's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.36x | 1.12x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127200.00 | $20.56 | $46.00 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.07 | $6.10 | $22.24 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +52.9% | +59.8% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.9 | 65.3 | 41.9 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 262K | 1.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRBP as "Buy", AGIO as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 370.5% upside for CRBP (target: $51) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.14 | $37.75 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 29 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AREB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AGIO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AREB vs CRBP vs AGIO vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Analysts rate Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (CRBP) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus AREB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
(AREB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 85% more volatile than AREB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (CRBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 52% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -16. 6% for American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Rebel Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -161. 2% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGIO leads at 56. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS?
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(CRBP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRBP leads at 0. 0% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AREB or CRBP or AGIO or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
(AREB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AREB: -100. 0%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AREB and CRBP and AGIO and RCUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (AREB (Consumer Cyclical) and CRBP (Healthcare) and AGIO (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AREB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.