Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARLP vs HCC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.

Coal

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.29B
5Y Perf.+706.0%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

Coal

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.63B
5Y Perf.+523.4%

ARLP vs HCC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARLP logoARLP
HCC logoHCC
IndustryCoalCoal
Market Cap$3.29B$4.63B
Revenue (TTM)$2.17B$1.47B
Net Income (TTM)$246M$138M
Gross Margin23.9%38.2%
Operating Margin14.4%9.7%
Forward P/E11.2x11.4x
Total Debt$480M$271M
Cash & Equiv.$71M$300M

ARLP vs HCCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARLP
HCC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Alliance Resource P… (ARLP)100806.0+706.0%
Warrior Met Coal, I… (HCC)100623.4+523.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARLP vs HCC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARLP leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Warrior Met Coal, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
The Income Pick

ARLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 10.3%
  • Rev growth -10.4%, EPS growth -12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.10x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

HCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 12.0% 10Y total return vs ARLP's 195.5%
  • +92.2% vs ARLP's +3.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARLP logoARLP-10.4% revenue growth vs HCC's -14.1%
ValueARLP logoARLPLower P/E (11.2x vs 11.4x)
Quality / MarginsARLP logoARLP11.3% margin vs HCC's 9.4%
Stability / SafetyARLP logoARLPBeta 0.07 vs HCC's 0.57
DividendsARLP logoARLP10.3% yield, vs HCC's 0.4%
Momentum (1Y)HCC logoHCC+92.2% vs ARLP's +3.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ARLP logoARLP8.6% ROA vs HCC's 5.0%, ROIC 12.9% vs 1.8%

ARLP vs HCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P.
FY 2025
Coal Products and Services Revenue
91.4%$1.9B
Royalty
6.5%$138M
Product and Service, Other
4.2%$88M
Shipping and Handling
1.7%$37M
Coal Royalties
-3.8%$-80,471,000
HCCWarrior Met Coal, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
97.5%$1.3B
Product and Service, Other
2.5%$33M

ARLP vs HCC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARLPLAGGINGHCC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARLP and HCC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARLP and HCC operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $1.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.3% (ARLP) to 9.4% (HCC). On growth, HCC holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.2B$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$626M$289M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$246M$138M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$339M-$135M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.9%+38.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.4%+9.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.3%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.6%-9.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.5%+53.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-87.7%+9.6%
Evenly matched — ARLP and HCC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 10.6x trailing earnings, ARLP trades at a 87% valuation discount to HCC's 81.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARLP's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCC's 19.5x.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$4.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.7B$4.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.56x81.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.17x11.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.40x19.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.50x3.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.76x2.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.48x
ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ARLP delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for HCC. HCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARLP's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLP scores 4/9 vs HCC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.5%+6.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.6%+5.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.9%+1.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.5%+1.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$409M-$29M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$71M$300M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$480M$271M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.19x14.30x
ARLP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARLP five years ago would be worth $61,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56,921 for HCC. Over the past 12 months, HCC leads with a +92.2% total return vs ARLP's +3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCC at 32.4% vs ARLP's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.3%-1.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.9%+92.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.4%+132.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+519.0%+469.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.5%+1201.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.9%+32.4%
HCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ARLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCC's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARLP currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs HCC's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.07x0.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.45$105.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.20$40.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.8%+83.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.248.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded380K848K
ARLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ARLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates ARLP as "Hold" and HCC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for HCC (target: $113) vs 17.4% for ARLP (target: $30). For income investors, ARLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.28% vs HCC's 0.39%.

MetricARLP logoARLPAlliance Resource…HCC logoHCCWarrior Met Coal,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$112.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1824
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+10.3%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.63$0.34
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%
ARLP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ARLP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HCC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallAlliance Resource Partners,… (ARLP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARLP vs HCC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARLP or HCC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the stronger pick with -10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARLP or HCC?

On trailing P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. at 81. 3x. On forward P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARLP or HCC?

Over the past 5 years, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) delivered a total return of +519. 0%, compared to +469. 2% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCC returned +1202% versus ARLP's +195. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARLP or HCC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Warrior Met Coal, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning HCC is approximately 704% more volatile than ARLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 26% for Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARLP or HCC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is pulling ahead at -10. 4% versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. grew EPS -12. 6% year-over-year, compared to -77. 5% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLP leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARLP or HCC?

Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 2% net margin versus 4. 4% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARLP leads at 17. 6% versus 3. 5% for HCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARLP leads at 21. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARLP or HCC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCC: 28. 2% to $112. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARLP or HCC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC).

09

Is ARLP or HCC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alliance Resource Partners, L.

P. (ARLP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 10. 3% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARLP: +195. 5%, HCC: +1202%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARLP and HCC?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ARLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ARLP pays a dividend while HCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ARLP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HCC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARLP and HCC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARLP: -4.5% · HCC: 53.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ARLP: 11.3% · HCC: 9.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ARLP: 10.6x · HCC: 81.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.