Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARMN
Aris Mining Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$3.93B
5Y Perf.+747.1%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.+214.2%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.48B
5Y Perf.+376.5%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.09B
5Y Perf.+745.5%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.

Silver

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$24.92B
5Y Perf.+277.3%

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARMN logoARMN
MUX logoMUX
HL logoHL
CDE logoCDE
PAAS logoPAAS
IndustryGoldOther Precious MetalsGoldGoldSilver
Market Cap$3.93B$1.45B$12.48B$12.09B$24.92B
Revenue (TTM)$925M$236M$1.57B$2.57B$4.02B
Net Income (TTM)$78M$74M$559M$799M$1.27B
Gross Margin48.7%23.3%50.9%35.4%43.8%
Operating Margin38.9%1.5%44.1%39.4%37.9%
Forward P/E8.4x21.0x20.7x9.4x12.1x
Total Debt$526M$926K$299M$365M$935M
Cash & Equiv.$392M$51M$242M$554M$1.21B

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARMN
MUX
HL
CDE
PAAS
StockSep 23Apr 26Return
Aris Mining Corpora… (ARMN)100847.1+747.1%
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100314.2+214.2%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100476.5+376.5%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100845.5+745.5%
Pan American Silver… (PAAS)100377.3+277.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Coeur Mining, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. ARMN and PAAS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ARMN
Aris Mining Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

ARMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 8.2% 10Y total return vs HL's 373.7%
  • Beta 0.55 vs CDE's 1.89
Best for: long-term compounding
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Quality Compounder

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 35.6% margin vs ARMN's 8.4%
  • +278.6% vs PAAS's +133.6%
  • 16.3% ROA vs ARMN's 3.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs 18.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • PEG 0.18 vs PAAS's 0.48
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs MUX's 13.2%
  • Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.48
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
The Income Pick

PAAS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 0.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.69x
  • Beta 0.88, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
  • 0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs MUX's 13.2%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.4x vs 12.1x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.48
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs ARMN's 8.4%
Stability / SafetyARMN logoARMNBeta 0.55 vs CDE's 1.89
DividendsPAAS logoPAAS0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+278.6% vs PAAS's +133.6%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs ARMN's 3.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs 18.3%

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARMNAris Mining Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
PAASPan American Silver Corp.
FY 2025
Refined Silver and Gold
81.0%$2.9B
Lead Concentrate
10.5%$379M
Zinc Concentrate
4.2%$153M
Silver Concentrate
2.8%$101M
Copper Concentrate
1.5%$56M

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARMNLAGGINGCDE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PAAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 17.0x MUX's $236M. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARMN's 8.4%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$925M$236M$1.6B$2.6B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$346M$34M$853M$1.2B$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$78M$74M$559M$799M$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$100M-$24M$472M$915M$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.7%+23.3%+50.9%+35.4%+43.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.9%+1.5%+44.1%+39.4%+37.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.4%+31.4%+35.6%+31.1%+31.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.8%-10.1%+30.0%+35.6%+34.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+104.2%+107.4%+57.4%+137.8%+49.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+92.3%+4.9%-160.0%+4.9%+134.8%
Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ARMN and CDE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.6x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 56% valuation discount to ARMN's 46.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs PAAS's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Market CapShares × price$3.9B$1.4B$12.5B$12.1B$24.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$1.4B$12.5B$11.9B$24.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS46.90x41.07x37.98x20.62x22.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.36x20.96x20.75x9.37x12.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x77.89x17.75x11.63x14.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.24x7.33x8.77x5.84x6.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x2.40x4.71x3.65x3.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.47x40.23x18.15x23.04x
Evenly matched — ARMN and CDE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $6 for ARMN. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMN's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs MUX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.0%+13.6%+22.5%+15.2%+19.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+9.0%+16.3%+11.2%+14.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.3%-1.9%+15.3%+23.5%+15.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.6%-1.9%+16.8%+23.9%+15.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.00x0.12x0.11x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$134M-$50M$57M-$188M-$277M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$392M$51M$242M$554M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$526M$926,000$299M$365M$935M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.70x1.03x19.04x47.33x23.79x
Evenly matched — HL and CDE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARMN five years ago would be worth $92,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,784 for PAAS. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +278.6% total return vs PAAS's +133.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMN at 108.9% vs MUX's 39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.6%+29.7%-1.4%+5.8%+16.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+228.7%+227.9%+278.6%+166.3%+133.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+811.4%+173.2%+203.4%+427.3%+237.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+820.9%+93.8%+161.8%+104.0%+77.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+824.8%+3.5%+373.7%+156.0%+335.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+108.9%+39.8%+44.8%+74.1%+50.0%
ARMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ARMN and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARMN is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAAS currently trades 84.5% from its 52-week high vs HL's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.55x1.49x1.51x1.89x0.88x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.29$29.70$34.17$27.77$69.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.54$6.88$4.68$6.20$22.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.6%+81.6%+54.5%+66.8%+84.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.153.446.246.057.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M1.0M15.2M22.1M6.2M
Evenly matched — ARMN and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ARMN as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", HL as "Hold", CDE as "Buy", PAAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for CDE (target: $27) vs 19.3% for HL (target: $22). PAAS is the only dividend payer here at 0.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$22.21$27.20$75.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts17262124
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01002
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.47
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.1%+0.2%
PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ARMN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). PAAS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallAris Mining Corporation (ARMN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARMN vs MUX vs HL vs CDE vs PAAS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 6x versus Aris Mining Corporation at 46. 9x. On forward P/E, Aris Mining Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

Over the past 5 years, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) delivered a total return of +820.

9%, compared to +77. 8% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARMN returned +824. 8% versus MUX's +3. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

55β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning CDE is approximately 243% more volatile than ARMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Aris Mining Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 168. 6% for McEwen Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 8. 4% for Aris Mining Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARMN leads at 38. 5% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARMN leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 46. 6% to $27. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS?

In this comparison, PAAS (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. ARMN, MUX, HL, CDE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ARMN or MUX or HL or CDE or PAAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

55), +824. 8% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMN: +824. 8%, CDE: +156. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARMN and MUX and HL and CDE and PAAS?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ARMN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS pays a dividend while ARMN, MUX, HL, CDE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ARMN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 52%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAAS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARMN and MUX and HL and CDE and PAAS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARMN: 104.2% · MUX: 107.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(ARMN: 8.4% · MUX: 31.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ARMN: 46.9x · MUX: 41.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.