Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Information Technology Services
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $9.70B | $2.17B | $14.22B | $6.62B | $18.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.51B | $8.27B | $22.90B | $24.96B | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $727M | $180M | $1.08B | $214M | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 22.0% | 21.6% | 10.5% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 4.8% | 7.3% | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | 7.5x | 9.9x | 16.2x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.09B | $1.59B | $6.33B | $2.88B | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $306M | $358M | $619M | $192M | $2.44B |
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrow Electronics, … (ARW) | 100 | 282.2 | +182.2% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| CDW Corporation (CDW) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 301.4 | +201.4% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 447.4 | +347.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 49.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.0%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6%
NSIT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.9x)
CDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 2.3%
- PEG 1.21 vs ARW's 1.38
- 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
- Beta 1.15 vs SNX's 1.43
AVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
SNX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs ARW's 218.0%
- +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs SNX's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 15.4% vs 6.0% |
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • ARW leads 0 • AVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 7.6x NSIT's $8.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (CDW) to 0.9% (AVT). On growth, ARW holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33.5B | $8.3B | $22.9B | $25.0B | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $477M | $1.9B | $781M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $727M | $180M | $1.1B | $214M | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $410M | $235M | $1.1B | $33M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +22.0% | +21.6% | +10.5% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +4.8% | +7.3% | +2.7% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +2.2% | +4.7% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +2.8% | +4.7% | +0.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +1.2% | +9.2% | +33.9% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +3.4% | +7.7% | +12.9% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CDW trades at a 54% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDW offers better value at 1.66x vs ARW's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.7B | $2.2B | $14.2B | $6.6B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $3.4B | $19.9B | $9.3B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.37x | 14.48x | 13.64x | 29.40x | 23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.06x | 7.55x | 9.91x | 16.22x | 13.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.16x | — | 1.66x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.59x | 7.05x | 10.21x | 12.44x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.26x | 0.63x | 0.30x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 1.38x | 5.59x | 1.41x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.77x | 13.06x | 11.47x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. ARW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDW's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSIT scores 6/9 vs CDW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +11.2% | +42.4% | +4.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +2.0% | +6.8% | +1.7% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +10.3% | +15.4% | +6.0% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +10.3% | +18.4% | +7.9% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.96x | 2.43x | 0.57x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $1.2B | $5.7B | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $306M | $358M | $619M | $192M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $1.6B | $6.3B | $2.9B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.11x | 2.97x | 11.25x | 2.80x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,954 for CDW. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs NSIT's -47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs NSIT's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +67.9% | -16.2% | -16.8% | +64.6% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.4% | -47.2% | -35.8% | +65.6% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.0% | -43.3% | -29.2% | +105.0% | +170.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.6% | -29.7% | -30.5% | +94.1% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.0% | +194.2% | +210.7% | +132.4% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | -17.2% | -10.9% | +27.0% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDW and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDW is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNX's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs NSIT's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.38x | 0.91x | 1.28x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $196.82 | $148.58 | $192.30 | $84.72 | $237.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $101.79 | $63.62 | $106.00 | $44.25 | $114.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +47.4% | +57.3% | +95.4% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.2 | 37.5 | 27.6 | 76.9 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 560K | 441K | 1.6M | 1.0M | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
CDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARW as "Hold", NSIT as "Buy", CDW as "Buy", AVT as "Hold", SNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.5% upside for CDW (target: $148) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). For income investors, CDW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $208.33 | $87.50 | $148.20 | $79.33 | $177.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.3% | +1.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 12 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.49 | $1.30 | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +7.0% | +4.6% | +4.6% | +3.3% |
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ARW vs NSIT vs CDW vs AVT vs SNX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CDW Corporation wins at 1. 21x versus Arrow Electronics, Inc. 's 1. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to -30. 5% for CDW Corporation (CDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus AVT's +135. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CDW Corporation (CDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 57% more volatile than CDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrow Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 49. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDW leads at 7. 4% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDW leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus Arrow Electronics, Inc. 's 1. 38x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDW: 34. 5% to $148. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX?
In this comparison, CDW (2.
3% yield), AVT (1. 6% yield), SNX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ARW, NSIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARW or NSIT or CDW or AVT or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
91), 2. 3% yield, +197. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDW: +197. 4%, NSIT: +250. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARW and NSIT and CDW and AVT and SNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARW is a small-cap deep-value stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CDW, AVT, SNX pay a dividend while ARW, NSIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.