Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASBA vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
ASBA vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.15B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $953M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.6% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 31.3x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $792M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $544M | $52M |
ASBA vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) | 100 | 105.4 | +5.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 191.1 | +91.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASBA vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASBA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 17.2%
- Beta 0.18, yield 3.6%
IBCP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 3.5%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs ASBA's 19.4%
- -0.3% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.3% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs IBCP's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.6% vs ASBA's +9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% |
ASBA vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASBA vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASBA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASBA is the larger business by revenue, generating $953M annually — 3.0x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASBA's 12.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $953M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $617M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $605M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 67% valuation discount to ASBA's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IBCP's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASBA's 18.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.29x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.77x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASBA. ASBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBCP's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs ASBA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$227M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $544M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $792M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,944 for ASBA. Over the past 12 months, IBCP leads with a +12.6% total return vs ASBA's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs ASBA's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.4% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.6% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ASBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBCP's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASBA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.37 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.29 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASBA and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, ASBA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs IBCP's 3.05%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ASBA leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ASBA vs IBCP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASBA or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger pick with -0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASBA or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Associated Banc-Corp at 31. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASBA or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to +19. 4% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus ASBA's +19. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASBA or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Independent Bank Corporation's 0. 83β — meaning IBCP is approximately 349% more volatile than ASBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 23% for Independent Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASBA or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is pulling ahead at -0.
3% versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Independent Bank Corporation grew EPS 3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 2% for Associated Banc-Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASBA or IBCP?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 12. 9% for Associated Banc-Corp — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus 24. 6% for ASBA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASBA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASBA or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 3. 0% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP).
08Is ASBA or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASBA: +19. 4%, IBCP: +184. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASBA and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASBA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.