Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.15B | $699M | $7.71B | $25.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $953M | $315M | $2.14B | $12.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $69M | $566M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 69.6% | 80.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.6% | 25.8% | 34.2% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 31.3x | 9.7x | 12.8x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $792M | $117M | $3.00B | $18.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $544M | $52M | $803M | $1.78B |
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) | 100 | 105.9 | +5.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASBA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 17.2%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.18 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs HBAN's 121.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- +12.6% vs CBSH's -13.9%
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs HBAN's 2.7%
HBAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 13.9%
- PEG 0.74 vs IBCP's 1.85
- 4.4% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% NII/revenue growth vs ASBA's -6.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs CBSH's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.6% vs CBSH's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs ASBA's 0.8% |
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASBA leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • CBSH leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASBA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 39.6x IBCP's $315M. CBSH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASBA's 12.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $953M | $315M | $2.1B | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $617M | $89M | $796M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | $69M | $566M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $605M | $70M | $570M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +69.6% | +80.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +25.8% | +34.2% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +21.7% | +26.5% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +22.2% | +27.7% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 67% valuation discount to ASBA's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBAN offers better value at 0.77x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $699M | $7.7B | $25.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $764M | $9.9B | $42.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.29x | 10.38x | 12.86x | 11.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.72x | 12.76x | 11.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x | 1.14x | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.77x | 9.39x | 12.87x | 15.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.22x | 3.60x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 1.41x | 1.91x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 9.96x | 13.01x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IBCP and CBSH each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASBA. ASBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBSH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs ASBA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +14.2% | +15.3% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.3% | +1.7% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +10.2% | +8.4% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +2.6% | +2.3% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.79x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$227M | $65M | $2.2B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $544M | $52M | $803M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $792M | $117M | $3.0B | $18.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.91x | 1.97x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,711 for CBSH. Over the past 12 months, IBCP leads with a +12.6% total return vs CBSH's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs CBSH's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +7.2% | +1.0% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | +12.6% | -13.9% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.4% | +130.6% | +20.2% | +85.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +63.7% | -12.9% | +22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.4% | +184.6% | +103.4% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.6% | +32.1% | +6.3% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ASBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBAN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASBA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.81x | 0.67x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.37 | $37.39 | $66.35 | $19.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.29 | $29.63 | $46.99 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +90.8% | +79.1% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 50.6 | 61.7 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 176K | 1.2M | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBSH and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IBCP as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold", HBAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs 11.5% for CBSH (target: $59). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs CBSH's 2.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $38.00 | $58.50 | $20.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 15 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.0% | +2.1% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $1.03 | $1.08 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.8% | +2.7% | 0.0% |
ASBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). IBCP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
ASBA vs IBCP vs CBSH vs HBAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the stronger pick with 4.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Associated Banc-Corp at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Huntington Bancshares Incorporated wins at 0. 74x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -12. 9% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +188. 6% versus ASBA's +19. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
20β versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 1. 08β — meaning HBAN is approximately 431% more volatile than ASBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 79% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is pulling ahead at 4.
4% versus -6. 6% for Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huntington Bancshares Incorporated grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 2% for Associated Banc-Corp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 5% net margin versus 12. 9% for Associated Banc-Corp — meaning it keeps 26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBSH leads at 34. 2% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASBA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 1% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH).
09Is ASBA or IBCP or CBSH or HBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Associated Banc-Corp (ASBA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
20), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASBA: +19. 9%, HBAN: +120. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASBA and IBCP and CBSH and HBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASBA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.