ASM vs CDE

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 30. 9% for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

(ASM) delivered a total return of +390. 0%, compared to +96. 0% for Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASM returned +435. 9% versus CDE's +149. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 81β versus Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. 's 2. 05β — meaning ASM is approximately 13% more volatile than CDE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 11% for Coeur Mining, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 30. 9% for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 183. 3% for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

(ASM) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus 28. 3% for Coeur Mining, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 33. 9% for ASM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASM leads at 48. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

(ASM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+435. 9% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASM: +435. 9%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.