ASNS vs CSCO

For growth investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 35. 9x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) delivered a total return of +89. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +299. 4% versus ASNS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Actelis Networks, Inc. 's 2. 67β — meaning ASNS is approximately 190% more volatile than CSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 63% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -52. 7% for Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Actelis Networks, Inc. grew EPS 33. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -225. 0% for Actelis Networks, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -195. 7% for ASNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, CSCO (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. ASNS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 8% yield, +299. 4% 10Y return). Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +299. 4%, ASNS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CSCO pays a dividend while ASNS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.