Chemicals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Industrial - Machinery | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $502M | $1.39B | $1.68B | $11.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $0.00 | $18M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-43M | $-386M | $-106M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | — | 24.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | — | -39.3% | — |
| Total Debt | $38M | $5M | $0.00 | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $203M | $836M | $788M |
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASP Isotopes Inc. C… (ASPI) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| Nano Nuclear Energy… (NNE) | 100 | 367.5 | +267.5% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 720.1 | +620.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.67, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -28.6%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs OKLO's -47.5%
- Beta 2.67 vs SMR's 3.63
NNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 428.9% 10Y total return vs OKLO's 388.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.18, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 53.48x
- Beta 3.18, current ratio 53.48x
- 2.5% margin vs SMR's -21.3%
SMR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OKLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +169.1% vs SMR's -25.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs OKLO's -47.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs SMR's -21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.67 vs SMR's 3.63 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.1% vs SMR's -25.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.2% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC -229.7% vs -98.6% |
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASPI leads in 1 of 6 categories
SMR leads 1 • OKLO leads 1 • NNE leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASPI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMR and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $18M and $0 in trailing revenue. ASPI is the more profitable business, keeping -12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -21.3%. On growth, ASPI holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $0 | $18M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$53M | -$711M | -$139M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$43M | -$386M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$13.3B | -$1.4B | -$572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | — | +24.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | — | -39.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | — | -21.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | — | -76.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | — | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -41.8% | -27.3% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $502M | $1.4B | $1.7B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $478M | $1.2B | $843M | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.54x | -25.90x | -5.78x | -100.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 121.22x | — | 53.34x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.85x | 4.68x | 1.84x | 7.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OKLO leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNE delivers a -7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ASPI. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASPI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASPI scores 5/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -190.4% | -7.3% | -48.9% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.2% | -7.2% | -38.1% | -11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.6% | -2.3% | -3.1% | -24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.1% | -34.7% | -87.8% | -15.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.02x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | -$198M | -$836M | -$787M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $203M | $836M | $788M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $5M | $0 | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.41x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNE five years ago would be worth $52,890 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,603 for SMR. Over the past 12 months, OKLO leads with a +169.1% total return vs SMR's -25.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASPI at 111.3% vs SMR's 16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | -0.6% | -23.1% | -6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.2% | +17.0% | -25.9% | +169.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +843.9% | +428.9% | +56.6% | +388.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.5% | +428.9% | +26.0% | +388.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.5% | +428.9% | +26.0% | +388.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.3% | +74.2% | +16.1% | +69.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASPI and NNE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASPI is the less volatile stock with a 2.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMR's 3.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNE currently trades 45.1% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.67x | 3.18x | 3.63x | 3.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.49 | $60.87 | $57.42 | $193.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.92 | $18.95 | $8.85 | $26.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.1% | +45.1% | +21.8% | +37.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 56.6 | 53.2 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 2.1M | 26.2M | 11.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASPI as "Buy", NNE as "Buy", SMR as "Buy", OKLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 141.6% upside for ASPI (target: $13) vs 30.2% for SMR (target: $16). ASPI is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $50.00 | $16.33 | $114.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $49929.39 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASPI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ASPI vs NNE vs SMR vs OKLO: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is the stronger pick with 857. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Analysts rate ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO?
Over the past 5 years, Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) delivered a total return of +428.
9%, compared to +26. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NNE returned +428. 9% versus SMR's +26. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 67β versus NuScale Power Corporation's 3. 63β — meaning SMR is approximately 36% more volatile than ASPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 74% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is pulling ahead at 857. 0% versus -15. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nano Nuclear Energy Inc grew EPS 99. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO?
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -1130. 3% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNE leads at 0. 0% versus -21. 9% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASPI leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO?
In this comparison, ASPI (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. NNE, SMR, OKLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ASPI or NNE or SMR or OKLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100. 0% yield, +101. 5% 10Y return). NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASPI: +101. 5%, SMR: +26. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ASPI and NNE and SMR and OKLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASPI (Basic Materials) and NNE (Industrials) and SMR (Utilities) and OKLO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASPI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OKLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ASPI pays a dividend while NNE, SMR, OKLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.