Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ASPS vs FAF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ASPS
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • LU
Market Cap$77M
5Y Perf.-94.0%
FAF
First American Financial Corporation

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.14B
5Y Perf.+38.2%

ASPS vs FAF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ASPS logoASPS
FAF logoFAF
IndustryReal Estate - ServicesInsurance - Specialty
Market Cap$77M$7.14B
Revenue (TTM)$175M$6.01B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$673M
Gross Margin27.8%74.3%
Operating Margin3.7%14.8%
Forward P/E45.3x10.9x
Total Debt$192M$1.91B
Cash & Equiv.$27M$1.39B

ASPS vs FAFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ASPS
FAF
StockMay 20May 26Return
Altisource Portfoli… (ASPS)1006.0-94.0%
First American Fina… (FAF)100138.2+38.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ASPS vs FAF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FAF leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASPS
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.
The Real Estate Income Play

ASPS is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 4.5% ROA vs FAF's 4.0%, ROIC 11.5% vs 10.7%
Best for: efficiency
FAF
First American Financial Corporation
The Insurance Pick

FAF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 3.1%
  • Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 376.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
  • 138.4% 10Y total return vs ASPS's -97.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFAF logoFAF21.6% revenue growth vs ASPS's 6.8%
ValueFAF logoFAFLower P/E (10.9x vs 45.3x)
Quality / MarginsFAF logoFAF11.2% margin vs ASPS's 3.6%
DividendsFAF logoFAF3.1% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FAF logoFAF+17.8% vs ASPS's -13.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ASPS logoASPS4.5% ROA vs FAF's 4.0%, ROIC 11.5% vs 10.7%

ASPS vs FAF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ASPSAltisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.
FY 2025
Service
94.3%$161M
Reimbursable Expenses
5.5%$9M
Non-controlling Interest Revenue
0.2%$313,000
FAFFirst American Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Title Insurance And Services
99.1%$7.0B
Corporate Segment
0.5%$32M
Corporate And Eliminations
0.4%$32M

ASPS vs FAF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFAFLAGGINGASPS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FAF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

FAF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 34.3x ASPS's $175M. FAF is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASPS's 3.6%. On growth, ASPS holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$175M$6.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$673M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$824M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.8%+74.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.7%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.6%+11.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.4%+13.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.5%-90.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+70.4%
FAF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FAF leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 11.6x trailing earnings, FAF trades at a 74% valuation discount to ASPS's 45.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FAF's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASPS's 16.2x.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
Market CapShares × price$77M$7.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$242M$7.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS45.27x11.63x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.23x7.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x0.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.36x
FAF leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ASPS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FAF scores 8/9 vs ASPS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.5%+4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.5%+10.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+158.5%+5.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$166M$519M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$192M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.16x6.45x
ASPS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FAF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FAF five years ago would be worth $12,070 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,271 for ASPS. Over the past 12 months, FAF leads with a +17.8% total return vs ASPS's -13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FAF at 9.3% vs ASPS's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.6%+15.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-13.8%+17.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.6%+30.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%+20.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+138.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.1%+9.3%
FAF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ASPS and FAF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ASPS is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FAF's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FAF currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ASPS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.33x0.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.96$71.47
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.30$53.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.5%+97.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.462.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K945K
Evenly matched — ASPS and FAF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FAF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

FAF is the only dividend payer here at 3.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricASPS logoASPSAltisource Portfo…FAF logoFAFFirst American Fi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$83.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts15
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.15
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+1.7%
FAF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FAF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASPS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst American Financial Co… (FAF)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ASPS vs FAF: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ASPS or FAF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. (ASPS). First American Financial Corporation (FAF) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First American Financial Corporation (FAF) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ASPS or FAF?

On trailing P/E, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the cheapest at 11.

6x versus Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. at 45. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ASPS or FAF?

Over the past 5 years, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) delivered a total return of +20.

7%, compared to -87. 3% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. (ASPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FAF returned +138. 4% versus ASPS's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ASPS or FAF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.

A. (ASPS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus First American Financial Corporation's 0. 59β — meaning FAF is approximately -278% more volatile than ASPS relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — ASPS or FAF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.

6% versus 6. 8% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. (ASPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to 112. 0% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASPS leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ASPS or FAF?

First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

4% net margin versus 0. 9% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FAF leads at 11. 1% versus 4. 6% for ASPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAF leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ASPS or FAF?

In this comparison, FAF (3.

1% yield) pays a dividend. ASPS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ASPS or FAF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.

A. (ASPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASPS: -97. 2%, FAF: +138. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ASPS and FAF?

These companies operate in different sectors (ASPS (Real Estate) and FAF (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ASPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock. FAF pays a dividend while ASPS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ASPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FAF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ASPS and FAF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ASPS: 9.5% · FAF: -90.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(ASPS: 3.6% · FAF: 11.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ASPS: 45.3x · FAF: 11.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.