Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $77M | $9.04B | $16.78B | $66M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $175M | $5.28B | $4.69B | $15M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $969M | $1.33B | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 61.1% | 60.1% | 72.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 22.9% | 37.4% | 16.3% |
| Forward P/E | 45.3x | 8.6x | 11.5x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $192M | $6.48B | $3.17B | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $3.60B | $656M | $25M |
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altisource Portfoli… (ASPS) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPS is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 4.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 11.5% vs 2.0%
WAL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 2.1%
- 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs EWBC's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
EWBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs WAL's 166.3%
- PEG 0.60 vs WAL's 0.74
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 45.3x)
- 28.3% margin vs ASPS's 3.6%
CLST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
- Beta 0.02, current ratio 0.40x
- NIM 3.5% vs WAL's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs EWBC's 4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 45.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.3% margin vs ASPS's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs EWBC's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs ASPS's -13.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 11.5% vs 2.0% |
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EWBC leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLST leads 1 • ASPS leads 0 • WAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 343.9x CLST's $15M. EWBC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASPS's 3.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $175M | $5.3B | $4.7B | $15M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $1.3B | $2.0B | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $969M | $1.3B | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$2.8B | $1.5B | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +61.1% | +60.1% | +72.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +22.9% | +37.4% | +16.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +18.4% | +28.3% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | -52.9% | +32.0% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +32.8% | +21.4% | -18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EWBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 79% valuation discount to ASPS's 45.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EWBC offers better value at 0.67x vs WAL's 0.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77M | $9.0B | $16.8B | $66M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $242M | $11.9B | $19.3B | $55M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.27x | 9.43x | 12.81x | 28.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.57x | 11.47x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.23x | 9.88x | 9.49x | 22.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 1.71x | 3.58x | 4.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.13x | 1.91x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.17x | 21.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for CLST. CLST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.8% | +15.8% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +158.5% | +10.4% | +3.9% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.82x | 0.36x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $166M | $2.9B | $2.5B | -$10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $3.6B | $656M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $192M | $6.5B | $3.2B | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.16x | 0.66x | 1.01x | 0.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EWBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,271 for ASPS. Over the past 12 months, EWBC leads with a +42.7% total return vs ASPS's -13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.0% vs ASPS's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -3.2% | +7.4% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.8% | +17.5% | +42.7% | +40.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +218.0% | +187.3% | +69.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -16.0% | +68.1% | +19.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +166.3% | +281.4% | +19.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.1% | +47.0% | +42.2% | +19.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASPS and EWBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASPS is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EWBC currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs ASPS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.33x | 1.72x | 1.22x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.96 | $97.23 | $127.52 | $18.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $65.81 | $86.58 | $11.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.5% | +84.7% | +95.6% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 64.8 | 66.3 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 1.3M | 1.0M | 7K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAL as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.2% upside for EWBC (target: $131) vs 6.7% for WAL (target: $88). For income investors, WAL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs EWBC's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.83 | $130.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 24 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 9 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.69 | $2.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +3.9% |
EWBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ASPS vs WAL vs EWBC vs CLST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
4x versus Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. at 45. 3x. On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: East West Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 60x versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -87. 3% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. (ASPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus ASPS's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.
A. (ASPS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately -615% more volatile than ASPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. (CLST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus 4. 6% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for East West Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 0. 9% for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S. A. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EWBC leads at 37. 4% versus 4. 6% for ASPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLST leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for East West Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EWBC: 7. 2% to $130. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST?
In this comparison, WAL (2.
1% yield), EWBC (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ASPS, CLST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASPS or WAL or EWBC or CLST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.
A. (ASPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33)). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASPS: -97. 2%, WAL: +166. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASPS and WAL and EWBC and CLST?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASPS (Real Estate) and WAL (Financial Services) and EWBC (Financial Services) and CLST (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock. WAL, EWBC pay a dividend while ASPS, CLST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.