Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Care Facilities
Biotechnology
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Biotechnology | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $964M | $2.04B | $902M | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-154M | $-238M | $-288M | $-123M |
| Gross Margin | -259.1% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34.6% | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $25M | $0.00 | $21M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $258M | $150M | $135M |
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
| Cybin Inc. (CYBN) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- -1.9% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
MNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs ATAI's -47.7%
- +214.0% vs CYBN's -1.9%
CMPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.33
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta 1.33 vs MNMD's 1.68
CYBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- EPS growth 93.5%
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 7.75x
- 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1%
- -58.3% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs MNMD's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs CYBN's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -58.3% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMPS leads in 1 of 6 categories
MNMD leads 1 • ATAI leads 0 • CYBN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATAI and CYBN operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$103M | -$191M | -$179M | -$147M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$154M | -$238M | -$288M | -$123M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$90M | -$174M | -$157M | -$106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.6% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.9% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -75.0% | -163.0% | -58.7% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ATAI and CYBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $964M | $2.0B | $902M | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $971M | $1.8B | $774M | $205M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.31x | -10.04x | -3.05x | -13.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3130.37x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.51x | 5.56x | — | 6.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MNMD and CYBN each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBN delivers a -81.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-81 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNMD scores 3/9 vs CMPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -96.4% | -102.5% | -3.4% | -81.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.3% | -70.7% | -106.8% | -58.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.0% | -3.9% | — | -115.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.4% | -52.2% | -2.5% | -54.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | — | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$258M | -$129M | -$135M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $258M | $150M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $0 | $21M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -68.93x | -21.81x | -52.40x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNMD five years ago would be worth $4,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $968 for CYBN. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs CYBN's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs CYBN's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +51.7% | +43.4% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +188.5% | +214.0% | +151.1% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.5% | +510.3% | +11.0% | -49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | -57.9% | -72.4% | -90.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.7% | +512.1% | -67.6% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +82.7% | +3.5% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNMD and CMPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMPS is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNMD's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs ATAI's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.68x | 1.33x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.75 | $21.09 | $10.21 | $9.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.29 | $6.03 | $2.25 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.4% | +98.1% | +92.0% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 64.9 | 68.1 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 792K | 3.7M | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATAI as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", CMPS as "Buy", CYBN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.3% upside for ATAI (target: $12) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $20.00 | $17.83 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 1 | 13 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CMPS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MNMD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ATAI vs MNMD vs CMPS vs CYBN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN?
Over the past 5 years, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) delivered a total return of -57. 9%, compared to -90. 3% for Cybin Inc. (CYBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus CYBN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning MNMD is approximately 27% more volatile than CMPS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cybin Inc.
grew EPS 93. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN?
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNMD leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ATAI or MNMD or CMPS or CYBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+512. 1% 10Y return). Cybin Inc. (CYBN) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNMD: +512. 1%, CYBN: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATAI and MNMD and CMPS and CYBN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare MNMD vs MGRX
MGRX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to MNMD.
Compare CMPS vs SAVA
SAVA overlaps with CMPS in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add ACAD to This Comparison
ACAD is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.