Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.09B
5Y Perf.-6.2%
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.+0.5%
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$192M
5Y Perf.-95.4%

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATCH logoATCH
GCMG logoGCMG
HLNE logoHLNE
LPRO logoLPRO
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureAsset ManagementAsset ManagementFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$2M$2.09B$4.25B$192M
Revenue (TTM)$15M$550M$713M$93M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$63M$206M$-5M
Gross Margin54.8%99.2%70.8%75.5%
Operating Margin-42.1%26.9%44.4%6.4%
Forward P/E12.5x14.8x14.9x
Total Debt$1.00B$480M$368M$88M
Cash & Equiv.$7.53B$242M$277M$177M

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPROLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATCH
GCMG
HLNE
LPRO
StockMar 21May 26Return
AtlasClear Holdings… (ATCH)1000.0-100.0%
GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG)10093.8-6.2%
Hamilton Lane Incor… (HLNE)100100.5+0.5%
Open Lending Corpor… (LPRO)1004.6-95.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HLNE leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. GCM Grosvenor Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. LPRO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATCH
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Angle

ATCH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor Inc.
The Banking Pick

GCMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 2.34x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.34x
  • Lower P/E (12.5x vs 14.9x)
  • Beta 0.89 vs ATCH's 2.58
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
The Banking Pick

HLNE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
  • 464.7% 10Y total return vs GCMG's 36.9%
  • PEG 0.72 vs GCMG's 1.44
  • 30.5% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LPRO
Open Lending Corporation
The Banking Pick

LPRO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 288.0%, EPS growth 96.8%
  • 288.0% NII/revenue growth vs GCMG's 5.1%
  • +4.5% vs HLNE's -42.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLPRO logoLPRO288.0% NII/revenue growth vs GCMG's 5.1%
ValueGCMG logoGCMGLower P/E (12.5x vs 14.9x)
Quality / MarginsHLNE logoHLNE30.5% margin vs LPRO's -4.5%
Stability / SafetyGCMG logoGCMGBeta 0.89 vs ATCH's 2.58
DividendsHLNE logoHLNE2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GCMG's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LPRO logoLPRO+4.5% vs HLNE's -42.6%
Efficiency (ROA)HLNE logoHLNE9.5% ROA vs LPRO's -2.0%, ROIC 21.2% vs 2.3%

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATCHAtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.
FY 2025
Asset Management
38.8%$426M
Management Fees, Before Reimbursement Revenue
37.1%$408M
Management Service, Incentive
11.2%$124M
Management Service, Incentive, Performance Fees
6.2%$68M
Management Service, Incentive, Carried Interest
5.0%$55M
Expense Reimbursement
1.6%$18M
HLNEHamilton Lane Incorporated
FY 2025
Management And Advisory Fee Revenue, Specialized Funds
44.3%$315M
Incentive Fee Revenue, Specialized Funds
25.6%$182M
Management And Advisory Fee Revenue, Customized Separate Accounts
18.9%$134M
Management And Advisory Fee Revenue, Reporting And Other
4.1%$29M
Management And Advisory Fee Revenue, Advisory
3.2%$23M
Incentive Fee Revenue, Customized Separate Accounts
2.3%$16M
Management And Advisory Fee Revenue, Fund Reimbursement Revenue
1.3%$10M
Other (1)
0.4%$3M
LPROOpen Lending Corporation
FY 2025
Program Fee
64.9%$54M
Profit Share
35.1%$29M

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLNELAGGINGATCH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

HLNE is the larger business by revenue, generating $713M annually — 48.8x ATCH's $15M. HLNE is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPRO's -4.5%.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$550M$713M$93M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$123M$320M-$5M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$63M$206M-$5M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$195M$364M-$425,000
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.8%+99.2%+70.8%+75.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-42.1%+26.9%+44.4%+6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.1%+8.2%+30.5%-4.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.6%+31.8%+43.7%-3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+4.0%-56.8%
HLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LPRO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.4x trailing earnings, HLNE trades at a 38% valuation discount to GCMG's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HLNE offers better value at 0.81x vs GCMG's 1.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
Market CapShares × price$2M$2.1B$4.2B$192M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$6.5B$2.3B$4.3B$103M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.70x26.57x16.44x-45.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.54x14.77x14.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.44x0.81x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.28x13.31x12.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.15x3.79x5.96x2.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.28x4.60x2.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.02x11.91x13.64x
LPRO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HLNE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GCMG delivers a 107.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $108 in annual profit, vs $-7 for LPRO. HLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCMG's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLNE scores 7/9 vs LPRO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.1%+107.6%+15.6%-7.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.3%+8.9%+9.5%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.1%+21.2%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.0%+24.3%+26.2%+2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.77x0.40x1.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6.5B$238M$91M-$89M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7.5B$242M$277M$177M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$480M$368M$88M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.07x13.83x25.57x-0.56x
HLNE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GCMG and HLNE and LPRO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HLNE five years ago would be worth $10,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for ATCH. Over the past 12 months, LPRO leads with a +4.5% total return vs HLNE's -42.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCMG at 17.1% vs ATCH's -92.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.0%-0.2%-34.5%+3.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.2%-8.0%-42.6%+4.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+60.5%+42.4%-78.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-0.8%+7.1%-95.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+36.9%+464.7%-83.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-92.4%+17.1%+12.5%-39.8%
Evenly matched — GCMG and HLNE and LPRO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GCMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GCMG is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATCH's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCMG currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs ATCH's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.58x0.89x1.25x2.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.92$13.22$179.19$2.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$9.30$86.47$1.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.9%+84.4%+49.6%+60.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.565.237.357.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.1M538K843K582K
GCMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HLNE and LPRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GCMG as "Buy", HLNE as "Buy", LPRO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 146.9% upside for LPRO (target: $4) vs 92.8% for HLNE (target: $172). For income investors, HLNE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.82% vs GCMG's 1.15%.

MetricATCH logoATCHAtlasClear Holdin…GCMG logoGCMGGCM Grosvenor Inc.HLNE logoHLNEHamilton Lane Inc…LPRO logoLPROOpen Lending Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$171.50$4.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts81012
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1112
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13$2.51
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.5%+6.0%+2.6%
Evenly matched — HLNE and LPRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HLNE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LPRO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATCH vs GCMG vs HLNE vs LPRO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is the stronger pick with 288.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

On trailing P/E, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is the cheapest at 16.

4x versus GCM Grosvenor Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, GCM Grosvenor Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

Over the past 5 years, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) delivered a total return of +7.

1%, compared to -100. 0% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLNE returned +464. 7% versus ATCH's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning ATCH is approximately 189% more volatile than GCMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 4% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) is pulling ahead at 288.

0% versus 5. 1% for GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GCM Grosvenor Inc. grew EPS 1124% year-over-year, compared to -670. 6% for AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.

(ATCH) is the more profitable company, earning 53. 0% net margin versus -4. 5% for Open Lending Corporation — meaning it keeps 53. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLNE leads at 44. 4% versus -45. 3% for ATCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GCMG leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Open Lending Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPRO: 146. 9% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO?

In this comparison, HLNE (2.

8% yield), GCMG (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ATCH, LPRO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ATCH or GCMG or HLNE or LPRO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, GCM Grosvenor Inc.

(GCMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 1. 2% yield). AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GCMG: +36. 9%, ATCH: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATCH and GCMG and HLNE and LPRO?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATCH (Technology) and GCMG (Financial Services) and HLNE (Financial Services) and LPRO (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATCH is a small-cap high-growth stock; GCMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLNE is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPRO is a small-cap high-growth stock. GCMG, HLNE pay a dividend while ATCH, LPRO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATCH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 42%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GCMG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HLNE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPRO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 144%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATCH and GCMG and HLNE and LPRO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATCH: 84.1% · GCMG: 5.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(ATCH: 12.1% · GCMG: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.