Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHA vs ACIU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ATHA vs ACIU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $17M | $298M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-129M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.3% |
| Total Debt | $803K | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $69M | $27M |
ATHA vs ACIU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| AC Immune S.A. (ACIU) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHA vs ACIU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.47
- EPS growth 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 2.9%, current ratio 1.88x
ACIU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -81.3% 10Y total return vs ATHA's -97.5%
- -38.7% ROA vs ATHA's -225.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -64.6% revenue growth vs ACIU's -86.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.47 vs ACIU's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.6% vs ACIU's +76.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -38.7% ROA vs ATHA's -225.7% |
ATHA vs ACIU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIU and ATHA operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$129M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -19.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -70.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ATHA and ACIU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $298M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$30M | $270M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -3.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 65.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 5.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ATHA and ACIU each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIU delivers a -101.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-102 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATHA. ATHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACIU's 0.10x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | -101.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -38.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -99.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | -72.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$68M | -$22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803,000 | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -482.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIU five years ago would be worth $4,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $235 for ATHA. Over the past 12 months, ATHA leads with a +81.6% total return vs ACIU's +76.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIU at 11.6% vs ATHA's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.6% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.6% | +76.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | +38.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -52.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | +11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHA and ACIU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHA is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACIU's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIU currently trades 73.3% from its 52-week high vs ATHA's 51.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.36 | $4.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.9% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 265K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ATHA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACIU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ATHA vs ACIU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHA or ACIU a better buy right now?
Analysts rate AC Immune S.
A. (ACIU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ATHA or ACIU?
Over the past 5 years, AC Immune S.
A. (ACIU) delivered a total return of -52. 4%, compared to -97. 7% for Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACIU returned -81. 3% versus ATHA's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ATHA or ACIU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus AC Immune S. A. 's 1. 63β — meaning ACIU is approximately 11% more volatile than ATHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Athira Pharma, Inc. (ATHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 10% for AC Immune S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ATHA or ACIU?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Athira Pharma, Inc.
grew EPS 2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -37. 3% for AC Immune S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ATHA or ACIU?
Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1971. 6% for AC Immune S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATHA leads at 0. 0% versus -1927. 3% for ACIU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIU leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ATHA or ACIU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ATHA or ACIU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athira Pharma, Inc.
(ATHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. AC Immune S. A. (ACIU) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHA: -97. 5%, ACIU: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ATHA and ACIU?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.