Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATHE
Alterity Therapeutics Limited

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-19.5%
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$94M
5Y Perf.+645.8%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.86B
5Y Perf.-54.6%
AVXL
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$289M
5Y Perf.-24.1%
BIIB
Biogen Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$28.25B
5Y Perf.-37.7%

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATHE logoATHE
SAVA logoSAVA
ACAD logoACAD
AVXL logoAVXL
BIIB logoBIIB
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$85M$94M$3.86B$289M$28.25B
Revenue (TTM)$9M$0.00$1.10B$0.00$9.86B
Net Income (TTM)$-31M$-106M$376M$-40M$1.37B
Gross Margin97.1%91.5%69.8%
Operating Margin-338.9%7.4%15.6%
Forward P/E50.9x13.0x
Total Debt$155K$0.00$52M$0.00$6.95B
Cash & Equiv.$33M$129M$178M$103M$3.01B

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATHE
SAVA
ACAD
AVXL
BIIB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Alterity Therapeuti… (ATHE)10080.5-19.5%
Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA)100745.8+645.8%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.4-54.6%
Anavex Life Science… (AVXL)10075.9-24.1%
Biogen Inc. (BIIB)10062.3-37.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BIIB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ATHE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ATHE
Alterity Therapeutics Limited
The Growth Play

ATHE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 35.3%, EPS growth 63.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 12.98x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 12.98x
  • 35.3% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

SAVA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • -22.9% 10Y total return vs SAVA's -19.5%
  • 34.3% margin vs ATHE's -330.6%
  • 26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
AVXL
Anavex Life Sciences Corp.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AVXL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
The Income Pick

BIIB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.64 vs SAVA's 2.02
  • +63.3% vs AVXL's -63.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthATHE logoATHE35.3% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
ValueBIIB logoBIIBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs ATHE's -330.6%
Stability / SafetyBIIB logoBIIBBeta 0.64 vs SAVA's 2.02
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BIIB logoBIIB+63.3% vs AVXL's -63.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs SAVA's -75.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -6.3%

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATHEAlterity Therapeutics Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SAVACassava Sciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
AVXLAnavex Life Sciences Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BIIBBiogen Inc.
FY 2025
MS Product Revenues
42.0%$4.0B
TYSABRI product
17.3%$1.7B
SPINRAZA
16.1%$1.5B
Fumarate
14.8%$1.4B
Interferon
9.8%$946M

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLATHELAGGINGAVXL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ATHE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BIIB and AVXL operate at a comparable scale, with $9.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATHE's -3.3%. On growth, ATHE holds the edge at +80.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$0$1.1B$0$9.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$32M-$110M$96M-$30M$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$31M-$106M$376M-$40M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M-$84M$212M-$34M$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.1%+91.5%+69.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.4%+7.4%+15.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.3%+34.3%+13.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.5%+19.4%+26.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+80.9%+9.7%+1.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+65.0%+62.1%-81.8%+54.4%+31.1%
ATHE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 55% valuation discount to BIIB's 21.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
Market CapShares × price$85M$94M$3.9B$289M$28.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$61M-$34M$3.7B$187M$32.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.65x-3.76x9.85x-5.78x21.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.50.91x13.05x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.91x11.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue21.47x3.61x2.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.62x0.63x3.15x2.81x1.54x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF36.74x13.78x
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-96 for SAVA. ATHE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIIB's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs AVXL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.7%-95.8%+35.6%-31.5%+7.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-67.9%-75.3%+26.2%-30.0%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.0%-6.3%+10.0%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-51.7%-99.9%+10.1%-47.8%+7.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952625
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.04x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M-$129M-$126M-$103M$3.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$33M$129M$178M$103M$3.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155,457$0$52M$0$6.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.91x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ATHE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACAD five years ago would be worth $10,710 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,759 for AVXL. Over the past 12 months, BIIB leads with a +63.3% total return vs AVXL's -63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATHE at 17.1% vs AVXL's -28.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.8%-6.5%-13.7%-15.2%+7.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.2%+25.3%+52.4%-63.2%+63.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.5%-40.8%+4.7%-62.9%-39.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.4%-67.0%+7.1%-72.4%-30.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.2%-19.5%-22.9%-25.7%-29.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.1%-16.0%+1.5%-28.1%-15.2%
ATHE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAVA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs AVXL's 22.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.04x2.02x1.26x1.51x0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.00$4.98$27.81$13.99$202.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.66$1.51$14.45$2.61$115.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.7%+39.3%+81.1%+22.3%+94.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.146.844.247.056.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded19K712K1.8M1.4M1.0M
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SAVA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", AVXL as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 252.6% upside for AVXL (target: $11) vs 10.5% for BIIB (target: $211).

MetricATHE logoATHEAlterity Therapeu…SAVA logoSAVACassava Sciences,…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…AVXL logoAVXLAnavex Life Scien…BIIB logoBIIBBiogen Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$34.78$11.00$211.42
# AnalystsCovering analysts12371348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ATHE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BIIB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallAlterity Therapeutics Limit… (ATHE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATHE vs SAVA vs ACAD vs AVXL vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Alterity Therapeutics Limited (ATHE) is the stronger pick with 35.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Biogen Inc. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

Over the past 5 years, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) delivered a total return of +7. 1%, compared to -72. 4% for Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (AVXL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAVA returned -19. 5% versus ATHE's -87. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.

(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Cassava Sciences, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SAVA is approximately 216% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alterity Therapeutics Limited (ATHE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 38% for Biogen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alterity Therapeutics Limited (ATHE) is pulling ahead at 35.

3% versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc. grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -223. 4% for Alterity Therapeutics Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -268. 0% for ATHE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATHE leads at 97. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.

(BIIB) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 37. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVXL: 252. 6% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ATHE or SAVA or ACAD or AVXL or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Biogen Inc.

(BIIB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIIB: -29. 2%, SAVA: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATHE and SAVA and ACAD and AVXL and BIIB?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ATHE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ATHE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 40%
  • Gross Margin > 58%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAVA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVXL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BIIB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.