Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $50M | $213.51B | $1.96T | $138.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $44.49B | $68.28B | $8.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $9.92B | $24.97B | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | 54.8% | 67.1% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | -312.1% | 25.5% | 40.9% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x | 36.5x | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $16.37B | $65.14B | $4.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $7.84B | $16.18B | $2.64B |
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aether Holdings, In… (ATHR) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 214.4 | +114.4% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 274.1 | +174.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATHR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 9.21x
- Beta 0.75 vs MRVL's 2.21
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 41.7x)
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AVGO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 29.0% 10Y total return vs MRVL's 15.8%
- PEG 0.73 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 36.6% margin vs ATHR's -301.6%
MRVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1%
- +184.6% vs ATHR's -58.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs ATHR's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs ATHR's -301.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs MRVL's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.6% vs ATHR's -58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs ATHR's -102.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs -24.7% |
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
AVGO leads 2 • ATHR leads 0 • MRVL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 50023.0x ATHR's $1M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATHR's -3.0%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $44.5B | $68.3B | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $12.8B | $38.8B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $9.9B | $25.0B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $12.5B | $28.9B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.5% | +54.8% | +67.1% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +25.5% | +40.9% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +22.3% | +36.6% | +32.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +28.1% | +42.3% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | -3.5% | +29.5% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +173.0% | +31.6% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 53% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.73x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $213.5B | $1.96T | $138.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $222.0B | $2.00T | $140.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.10x | 40.43x | 86.49x | 52.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.84x | 36.45x | 41.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 19.44x | 1.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.91x | 58.52x | 106.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 35.97x | 4.82x | 30.62x | 16.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.97x | 10.56x | 24.63x | 9.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.65x | 72.67x | 99.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-122 for ATHR. MRVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs ATHR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.2% | +40.2% | +32.9% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.7% | +18.4% | +14.9% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.7% | +29.1% | +14.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -140.4% | +28.9% | +16.9% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.77x | 0.80x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $8.5B | $49.0B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $7.8B | $16.2B | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $16.4B | $65.1B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.60x | 9.24x | 15.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,113 for ATHR. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +184.6% total return vs ATHR's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs ATHR's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.8% | +17.6% | +18.9% | +79.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.9% | +42.9% | +102.6% | +184.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +96.4% | +566.4% | +291.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +58.5% | +833.6% | +250.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | +350.2% | +2897.3% | +1581.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | +25.2% | +88.2% | +57.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHR and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs ATHR's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.55x | 1.96x | 2.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $223.66 | $437.68 | $175.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.90 | $121.99 | $198.43 | $53.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.8% | +90.6% | +94.3% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 80.1 | 68.0 | 78.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 15.1M | 23.3M | 24.8M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QCOM as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $175.00 | $443.72 | $129.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 69 | 58 | 72 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 23 | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.44 | $2.30 | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.3% | +1.5% |
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AVGO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ATHR vs QCOM vs AVGO vs MRVL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -28. 9% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus ATHR's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aether Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (ATHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 194% more volatile than ATHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -4. 1% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (ATHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -265. 2% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -227. 5% for Aether Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -235. 5% for ATHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATHR leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Marvell Technology, Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ATHR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATHR or QCOM or AVGO or MRVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +350. 2% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +350. 2%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHR and QCOM and AVGO and MRVL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. QCOM, AVGO pay a dividend while ATHR, MRVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.