ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
Asset Management
Market Cap$5.14B
5Y Perf.-1.1%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ATHS vs FG vs GL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.-30.2%
GL
Globe Life Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$11.85B
5Y Perf.+29.8%
ATHS vs FG vs GL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ATHS | FG | GL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $5.14B | $3.84B | $11.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.68B | $5.86B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $308M | $534M | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.0% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.5% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 7.2x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.24B | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14.99B | $1.49B | $145M |
ATHS vs FG vs GL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ATHS
FG
GL
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athene Holding Ltd.… (ATHS) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| F&G Annuities & Lif… (FG) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| Globe Life Inc. (GL) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATHS vs FG vs GL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ATHS and GL are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Globe Life Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ATHS
Athene Holding Ltd. 7.250% Fixe
The Banking Pick
ATHS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth -21.7%
- PEG 0.15 vs GL's 0.62
- Beta 0.18, yield 3.3%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
FG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 3.7%
- 3.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7%
Best for: income & stability
GL
Globe Life Inc.
The Insurance Pick
GL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.3% 10Y total return vs FG's 85.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 9.66x
- 19.4% margin vs FG's 9.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATHS | 24.1% NII/revenue growth vs GL's 3.8% |
| Value | ATHS | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 9.7x), PEG 0.15 vs 0.62 |
| Quality / Margins | GL | 19.4% margin vs FG's 9.1% |
| Stability / Safety | ATHS | Beta 0.18 vs FG's 1.12 |
| Dividends | FG | 3.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GL | +25.6% vs FG's -4.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GL | 3.8% ROA vs ATHS's 0.1% |
ATHS vs FG vs GL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2025
ATHS vs FG vs GL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLATHSLAGGINGFG
FGF&G Annuities & Life,…
0leads
GLGlobe Life Inc.
1leads
ATHSAthene Holding Ltd. 7…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GLvs FGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ATHS4/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GL7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATHS is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.7B annually — 4.4x FG's $5.9B. GL is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FG's 9.1%. On growth, FG holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.7B | $5.9B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.6B | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $308M | $534M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $470M | $4.1B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +33.0% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +11.5% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +9.1% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +69.6% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +39.0% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.9% | +9.3% |
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.8x trailing earnings, ATHS trades at a 88% valuation discount to FG's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATHS offers better value at 0.15x vs GL's 0.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $3.8B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$9.9B | $4.6B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.78x | 15.05x | 10.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.16x | 9.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — | 0.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.64x | 9.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.67x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 0.76x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 84.19x | 0.82x | 9.45x |
ATHS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $0 for ATHS. GL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FG's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GL scores 8/9 vs ATHS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +11.1% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +0.6% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.0% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.4% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.45x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15.0B | $751M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15.0B | $1.5B | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.2B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.07x | 11.27x |
GL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FG five years ago would be worth $18,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,407 for ATHS. Over the past 12 months, GL leads with a +25.6% total return vs FG's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FG at 22.7% vs ATHS's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -5.0% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | -4.8% | +25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +84.8% | +42.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +85.8% | +47.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +85.8% | +173.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.5% | +22.7% | +12.5% |
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FG's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GL currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FG's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.18x | 1.12x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.17 | $36.70 | $156.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.60 | $20.57 | $116.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +77.1% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.3 | 49.7 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 594K | 451K |
Evenly matched — ATHS and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FG as "Hold", GL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for GL (target: $171) vs 9.5% for FG (target: $31). For income investors, FG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.67% vs GL's 0.70%.
| Metric | ATHSAthene Holding Lt… | FGF&G Annuities & L… | GLGlobe Life Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.00 | $171.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +3.7% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.04 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +7.4% |
Evenly matched — FG and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ATHS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
Best OverallAthene Holding Ltd. 7.250% … (ATHS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ATHS vs FG vs GL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATHS or FG or GL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Globe Life Inc. (GL). Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATHS or FG or GL?
On trailing P/E, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the cheapest at 1. 8x versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATHS or FG or GL?
Over the past 5 years, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to +14. 1% for Athene Holding Ltd. 7. 250% Fixe (ATHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GL returned +173. 3% versus ATHS's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATHS or FG or GL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning FG is approximately 540% more volatile than ATHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globe Life Inc. (GL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 45% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATHS or FG or GL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus 3. 8% for Globe Life Inc. (GL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Globe Life Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -61. 5% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FG leads at 36. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATHS or FG or GL?
Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 4. 6% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GL leads at 24. 4% versus 0. 0% for ATHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GL leads at 33. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATHS or FG or GL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Globe Life Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GL: 13. 4% to $171. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATHS or FG or GL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Globe Life Inc. (GL).
09Is ATHS or FG or GL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Athene Holding Ltd.
7. 250% Fixe (ATHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 3. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATHS: +14. 1%, FG: +85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATHS and FG and GL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ATHS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FG is a small-cap deep-value stock; GL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ATHS: 24.1% · FG: 39.0%)Net Margin>
%
(ATHS: 10.6% · FG: 9.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ATHS: 1.8x · FG: 15.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.