Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $118M | $349M | $1.41B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $436M | $3.09B | $17.96B | $5.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-59M | $-266M | $-13M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 10.6% | 26.3% | 16.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.5% | -2.8% | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.0x | 8.3x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $159M | $2.39B | $421M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81K | $33M | $871M | $464M |
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic Internatio… (ATLN) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 49.9 | -50.1% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 25.1 | -74.9% |
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATLN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth 70.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- -12.2% vs ATLN's -51.9%
MAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 0.6% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 20.8x)
RHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 8.7%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs KELYA's -33.0%
- Beta 0.99, yield 8.7%, current ratio 1.52x
- 2.5% margin vs ATLN's -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs ATLN's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs ATLN's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.2% vs ATLN's -51.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ATLN's -54.4%, ROIC 4.6% vs -98.9% |
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RHI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • KELYA leads 1 • ATLN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 41.2x ATLN's $436M. RHI is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATLN's -13.6%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $436M | $3.1B | $18.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | -$54M | $236M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$59M | -$266M | -$13M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $66M | -$161M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +26.3% | +16.7% | +36.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -2.8% | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | -8.6% | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +2.1% | -0.9% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | -100.0% | +7.1% | -5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.8% | -2.1% | +36.2% | -39.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RHI's 21.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $118M | $349M | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $475M | $2.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -1.34x | -104.90x | 20.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.96x | 8.28x | 20.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.02x | 21.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.08x | 0.08x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.35x | 0.69x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.06x | — | 10.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MAN and RHI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KELYA scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -24.6% | -0.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.4% | -11.3% | -0.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.9% | -4.0% | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | -4.3% | +6.2% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 1.16x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | $126M | $1.5B | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81,134 | $33M | $871M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $159M | $2.4B | $421M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.48x | -12.07x | 1.98x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KELYA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KELYA five years ago would be worth $4,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for ATLN. Over the past 12 months, KELYA leads with a -12.2% total return vs ATLN's -51.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KELYA at -13.0% vs ATLN's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | +13.1% | +1.2% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.9% | -12.2% | -17.0% | -31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | -34.2% | -46.4% | -49.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -58.3% | -64.9% | -58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -33.0% | -30.8% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.6% | -13.0% | -18.8% | -20.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KELYA and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATLN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KELYA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs ATLN's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.01x | 1.03x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.25 | $14.94 | $47.34 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $7.98 | $25.15 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.4% | +64.9% | +64.3% | +56.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 63.7 | 47.1 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 361K | 1.1M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", RHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.67% vs KELYA's 3.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $37.86 | $40.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +4.7% | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 | $1.43 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +2.7% | +3.3% |
RHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ATLN vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
Over the past 5 years, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) delivered a total return of -58. 3%, compared to -99. 2% for Atlantic International Corp. (ATLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHI returned +10. 2% versus ATLN's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Atlantic International Corp. 's 1. 09β — meaning ATLN is approximately 10% more volatile than RHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atlantic International Corp. grew EPS 70. 7% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATLN leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -13. 6% for Atlantic International Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHI leads at 1. 4% versus -11. 5% for ATLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RHI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Robert Half International Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 54. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI?
In this comparison, RHI (8.
7% yield), MAN (4. 7% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ATLN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ATLN or KELYA or MAN or RHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 8. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RHI: +10. 2%, ATLN: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATLN and KELYA and MAN and RHI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATLN (Healthcare) and KELYA (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and RHI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ATLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KELYA, MAN, RHI pay a dividend while ATLN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.