Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4.48B | $11.11B | $26.21B | $9.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.35B | $2.49B | $6.00B | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $211M | $-40M | $906M | $379M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 38.3% | 35.5% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 2.8% | 20.8% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 33.8x | 25.0x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $570M | $946M | $2.61B | $730M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $236M | $563M | $483M | $180M |
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atmus Filtration Te… (ATMU) | 100 | 264.4 | +164.4% |
| Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) | 100 | 172.5 | +72.5% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| Donaldson Company, … (DCI) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ATMU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 33.8x)
- 15.7% margin vs LFUS's -1.6%
- 14.4% ROA vs LFUS's -1.0%, ROIC 31.2% vs 1.0%
LFUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 8.9% revenue growth vs DCI's 2.9%
- +132.6% vs DCI's +31.6%
HUBB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 410.7% 10Y total return vs LFUS's 317.6%
- PEG 1.20 vs DCI's 2.45
DCI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 50.2%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.97, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 0.97 vs LFUS's 1.76
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs DCI's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 33.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs LFUS's -1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs LFUS's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs LFUS's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.6% vs DCI's +31.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs LFUS's -1.0%, ROIC 31.2% vs 1.0% |
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATMU leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCI leads 1 • LFUS leads 0 • HUBB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ATMU and LFUS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 4.4x ATMU's $1.3B. ATMU is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LFUS's -1.6%. On growth, LFUS holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $2.5B | $6.0B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | $227M | $1.5B | $599M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $211M | -$40M | $906M | $379M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $390M | $909M | $350M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +38.3% | +35.5% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +2.8% | +20.8% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -1.6% | +15.1% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +15.7% | +15.2% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +18.5% | +11.1% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +69.1% | +8.3% | -1.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ATMU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, ATMU trades at a 26% valuation discount to HUBB's 29.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs DCI's 3.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $11.1B | $26.2B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $11.5B | $28.3B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.94x | -152.27x | 29.81x | 28.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.79x | 33.79x | 25.01x | 21.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.78x | — | 1.43x | 3.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.10x | 83.21x | 20.81x | 15.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 4.66x | 4.48x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.00x | 4.53x | 6.85x | 7.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.10x | 30.35x | 29.97x | 29.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LFUS. LFUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATMU's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATMU scores 7/9 vs LFUS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +58.8% | -1.6% | +24.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.4% | -1.0% | +11.6% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.2% | +1.0% | +17.1% | +21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.6% | +1.1% | +20.1% | +25.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | 0.39x | 0.68x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | $383M | $2.1B | $550M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $236M | $563M | $483M | $180M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $570M | $946M | $2.6B | $730M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.02x | -0.93x | 16.90x | 18.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ATMU and LFUS and HUBB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUBB five years ago would be worth $25,941 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,997 for DCI. Over the past 12 months, LFUS leads with a +132.6% total return vs DCI's +31.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATMU at 36.6% vs DCI's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | +68.5% | +6.8% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.7% | +132.6% | +41.5% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +73.3% | +87.9% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +71.8% | +159.4% | +40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +317.6% | +410.7% | +194.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.6% | +20.1% | +23.4% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LFUS and DCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LFUS's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LFUS currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs DCI's 76.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.76x | 1.38x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.50 | $475.00 | $565.50 | $112.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.58 | $188.08 | $349.40 | $65.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.5% | +93.0% | +87.2% | +76.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 76.2 | 41.2 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 996K | 265K | 546K | 639K |
Analyst Outlook
DCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATMU as "Buy", LFUS as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold", DCI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.2% upside for DCI (target: $103) vs -26.5% for ATMU (target: $40). For income investors, DCI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs ATMU's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.33 | $400.00 | $535.14 | $103.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 | 17 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 16 | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | $2.89 | $5.35 | $1.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.2% | +0.9% | +3.3% |
ATMU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DCI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
ATMU vs LFUS vs HUBB vs DCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Littelfuse, Inc.
(LFUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
On trailing P/E, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
(ATMU) is the cheapest at 21. 9x versus Hubbell Incorporated at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hubbell Incorporated wins at 1. 20x versus Donaldson Company, Inc. 's 2. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
Over the past 5 years, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) delivered a total return of +159.
4%, compared to +40. 0% for Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBB returned +410. 7% versus ATMU's +155. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Donaldson Company, Inc.
(DCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Littelfuse, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning LFUS is approximately 81% more volatile than DCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 151% for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Littelfuse, Inc.
(LFUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus 2. 9% for Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hubbell Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -172. 5% for Littelfuse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBB leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus -3. 0% for Littelfuse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 1. 6% for LFUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFUS leads at 38. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus Donaldson Company, Inc. 's 2. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Littelfuse, Inc. — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCI: 20. 2% to $103. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 4% for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU).
09Is ATMU or LFUS or HUBB or DCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Donaldson Company, Inc.
(DCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 1. 3% yield, +194. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DCI: +194. 5%, ATMU: +155. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ATMU and LFUS and HUBB and DCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ATMU (Industrials) and LFUS (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials) and DCI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
LFUS, HUBB, DCI pay a dividend while ATMU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.