ATPC vs CLPS vs CODA vs NHTC vs AVAV

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the cheapest at 32. 2x versus AeroVironment, Inc. at 108. 5x. On forward P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, AeroVironment, Inc.

(AVAV) delivered a total return of +53. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ATPC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) is the lower-risk stock at -2.

01β versus AeroVironment, Inc. 's 1. 57β — meaning AVAV is approximately -178% more volatile than ATPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -7. 6% for Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -21. 7% for Agape ATP Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVAV leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -186. 8% for Agape ATP Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -194. 5% for ATPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NHTC leads at 73. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 58. 4x for AeroVironment, Inc. — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.

In this comparison, NHTC (25.

0% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ATPC, CODA, AVAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -2.

01)). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATPC: -100. 0%, AVAV: +498. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ATPC (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and NHTC (Consumer Cyclical) and AVAV (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NHTC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS, NHTC pay a dividend while ATPC, CODA, AVAV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.