ATR vs PG

For growth investors, AptarGroup, Inc.

(ATR) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AptarGroup, Inc.

(ATR) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus The Procter & Gamble Company at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, The Procter & Gamble Company is actually cheaper at 21. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AptarGroup, Inc. wins at 1. 71x versus The Procter & Gamble Company's 3. 83x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) delivered a total return of +23.

8%, compared to -16. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PG returned +121. 5% versus ATR's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus AptarGroup, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning ATR is approximately 540% more volatile than PG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 68% for The Procter & Gamble Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AptarGroup, Inc.

(ATR) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Procter & Gamble Company grew EPS 8. 1% year-over-year, compared to 6. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 10. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PG leads at 24. 3% versus 13. 6% for ATR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PG leads at 51. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 71x versus The Procter & Gamble Company's 3. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) trades at 21. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for AptarGroup, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 38. 4% to $169. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 5% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10), 2. 7% yield, +121. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PG: +121. 5%, ATR: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ATR (Healthcare) and PG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.