Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ATR vs SLGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.89B
5Y Perf.+10.1%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.28B
5Y Perf.+21.1%

ATR vs SLGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ATR logoATR
SLGN logoSLGN
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$7.89B$4.28B
Revenue (TTM)$3.87B$6.58B
Net Income (TTM)$387M$283M
Gross Margin21.9%17.4%
Operating Margin13.0%9.8%
Forward P/E22.0x10.7x
Total Debt$1.53B$4.62B
Cash & Equiv.$402M$1.08B

ATR vs SLGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ATR
SLGN
StockMay 20May 26Return
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR)100110.1+10.1%
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)100121.1+21.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ATR vs SLGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ATR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Silgan Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
The Income Pick

ATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.5%
  • Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 56.4%, current ratio 1.62x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SLGN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 82.0% 10Y total return vs ATR's 80.7%
  • 10.7% revenue growth vs ATR's 5.4%
  • Lower P/E (10.7x vs 22.0x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLGN logoSLGN10.7% revenue growth vs ATR's 5.4%
ValueSLGN logoSLGNLower P/E (10.7x vs 22.0x)
Quality / MarginsATR logoATR10.0% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
Stability / SafetyATR logoATRBeta 0.66 vs SLGN's 0.66, lower leverage
DividendsSLGN logoSLGN2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)ATR logoATR-17.5% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ATR logoATR7.6% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 10.7% vs 8.7%

ATR vs SLGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ATRAptarGroup, Inc.
FY 2025
Pharma Segment
57.0%$1.7B
Beauty Segment
43.0%$1.3B
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Containers
48.4%$3.1B
Dispensing and Specialty Closures
41.8%$2.7B
Custom Containers
9.8%$638M

ATR vs SLGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLATRLAGGINGSLGN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ATR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 1.7x ATR's $3.9B. ATR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, ATR holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.9B$6.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$801M$966M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$387M$283M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$325M$307M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.9%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.0%+9.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.0%+4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.4%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.8%+6.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.3%-6.3%
ATR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.0x trailing earnings, SLGN trades at a 28% valuation discount to ATR's 20.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLGN's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATR's 11.3x.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
Market CapShares × price$7.9B$4.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$7.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.86x15.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.02x10.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.28x8.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.09x0.66x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.02x1.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF26.35x10.13x
SLGN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ATR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ATR delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. ATR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs ATR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.6%+12.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.6%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.7%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x2.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$402M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$4.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.19x3.36x
ATR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ATR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,218 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,370 for ATR. Over the past 12 months, ATR leads with a -17.5% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATR at 1.7% vs SLGN's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.9%-1.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-17.5%-23.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.3%-10.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.3%+2.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+80.7%+82.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.7%-3.7%
ATR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ATR is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLGN's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATR currently trades 74.6% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$164.28$57.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$103.23$36.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.6%+71.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.244.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded466K767K
ATR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ATR and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ATR as "Buy" and SLGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for ATR (target: $170) vs 24.7% for SLGN (target: $51). For income investors, SLGN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.98% vs ATR's 1.48%.

MetricATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$169.67$50.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1821
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3321
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.81$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.6%+1.6%
Evenly matched — ATR and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ATR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallAptarGroup, Inc. (ATR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ATR vs SLGN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ATR or SLGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ATR or SLGN?

On trailing P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus AptarGroup, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ATR or SLGN?

Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) delivered a total return of +2. 2%, compared to -16. 3% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLGN returned +82. 0% versus ATR's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ATR or SLGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AptarGroup, Inc.

(ATR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning SLGN is approximately 0% more volatile than ATR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ATR or SLGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus 5. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AptarGroup, Inc. grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATR leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ATR or SLGN?

AptarGroup, Inc.

(ATR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATR leads at 13. 6% versus 10. 2% for SLGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATR leads at 29. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ATR or SLGN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for AptarGroup, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 38. 4% to $169. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ATR or SLGN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 5% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR).

09

Is ATR or SLGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.

(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +82. 0%, ATR: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ATR and SLGN?

These companies operate in different sectors (ATR (Healthcare) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ATR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLGN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ATR and SLGN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ATR: 10.8% · SLGN: 6.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(ATR: 10.0% · SLGN: 4.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ATR: 20.9x · SLGN: 15.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.