AUB vs FULT vs WSFS vs NBTB

For growth investors, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is the stronger pick with 28.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.

2x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 69x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +61.

1%, compared to +20. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +129. 1% versus AUB's +95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

73β versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning AUB is approximately 51% more volatile than WSFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 37% for Fulton Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is pulling ahead at 28.

2% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -9. 4% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

1% net margin versus 15. 9% for Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 19. 5% for AUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for WSFS Financial Corporation — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AUB: 12. 9% to $45. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

73), 0. 9% yield, +129. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +129. 1%, AUB: +95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AUB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.