AUGO vs HL vs PAAS vs CDE

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aura Minerals (AUGO) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 22. 4x versus Hecla Mining Company at 42. 0x. On forward P/E, Aura Minerals is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Aura Minerals (AUGO) delivered a total return of +260.

6%, compared to +97. 7% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +385. 2% versus CDE's +151. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Aura Minerals's 1. 96β — meaning AUGO is approximately 121% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 155% for Aura Minerals — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -128. 6% for Aura Minerals. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -8. 6% for Aura Minerals — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUGO leads at 49. 2% versus 32. 3% for PAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUGO leads at 58. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Aura Minerals (AUGO) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for Hecla Mining Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 34. 9% to $27. 20.

In this comparison, AUGO (1.

7% yield), PAAS (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. HL, CDE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 0. 7% yield, +324. 5% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +324. 5%, CDE: +151. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AUGO, PAAS pay a dividend while HL, CDE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.