Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AUPH vs CORT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AUPH vs CORT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $5.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $283M | $769M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $287M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 88.5% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 37.1% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 138.9x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $120M |
AUPH vs CORT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Corcept Therapeutic… (CORT) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUPH vs CORT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.86
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 5.25x
CORT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs AUPH's 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs CORT's 12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 138.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 101.5% margin vs CORT's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs CORT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.1% vs CORT's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 38.2% ROA vs CORT's 5.8%, ROIC 16.6% vs 6.2% |
AUPH vs CORT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AUPH vs CORT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CORT is the larger business by revenue, generating $769M annually — 2.7x AUPH's $283M. AUPH is the more profitable business, keeping 101.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CORT's 6.2%. On growth, AUPH holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $283M | $769M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $287M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $135M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +101.5% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.8% | +4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.0% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AUPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, AUPH trades at a 88% valuation discount to CORT's 63.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AUPH's 20.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CORT's 117.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.85x | 63.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.97x | 138.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.44x | 117.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.59x | 7.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.88x | 9.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.88x | 39.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH delivers a 49.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $49 in annual profit, vs $8 for CORT. CORT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUPH's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs CORT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +49.4% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +38.2% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.6% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$114M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CORT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CORT five years ago would be worth $24,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,165 for AUPH. Over the past 12 months, AUPH leads with a +100.1% total return vs CORT's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CORT at 30.0% vs AUPH's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.1% | -26.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.2% | +119.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.4% | +991.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CORT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUPH currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs CORT's 57.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.88 | $91.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.29 | $28.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +57.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 75.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AUPH as "Buy" and CORT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.4% upside for CORT (target: $72) vs -4.6% for AUPH (target: $16).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.50 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +4.4% |
AUPH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CORT leads in 1 (Total Returns).
AUPH vs CORT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUPH or CORT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AUPH or CORT?
On trailing P/E, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated at 63. 6x. On forward P/E, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AUPH or CORT?
Over the past 5 years, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to +31. 6% for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CORT returned +991. 0% versus AUPH's +552. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AUPH or CORT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated's 1. 78β — meaning CORT is approximately 106% more volatile than AUPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AUPH or CORT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus 12. 8% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUPH leads at 28. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AUPH or CORT?
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus 13. 1% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 5. 9% for CORT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CORT leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AUPH or CORT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 138. 9x for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated — 118. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CORT: 37. 4% to $71. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AUPH or CORT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AUPH or CORT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), +552. 4% 10Y return). Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUPH: +552. 4%, CORT: +991. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AUPH and CORT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CORT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.