Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AUPH vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AUPH vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.15B | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $283M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $287M | $-303M |
| Gross Margin | 88.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.1% | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $75M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $80M | $357M |
AUPH vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUPH vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.86
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -19.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.6% vs AUPH's +100.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 101.5% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs AUPH's +100.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 38.2% ROA vs PRAX's -53.5%, ROIC 16.6% vs -65.0% |
AUPH vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AUPH vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $283M and $0 in trailing revenue. On growth, AUPH holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $283M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105M | -$326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $287M | -$303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $135M | -$249M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +101.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.0% | -19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AUPH and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.85x | -25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.97x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.44x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.59x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.88x | 8.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.88x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH delivers a 49.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $49 in annual profit, vs $-59 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUPH's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +49.4% | -58.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +38.2% | -53.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.6% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.9% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $80M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AUPH five years ago would be worth $13,165 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,157 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +860.9% total return vs AUPH's +100.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 176.1% vs AUPH's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.1% | +860.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.2% | +2005.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.6% | -18.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.4% | -19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +176.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.88 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.29 | $34.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AUPH as "Buy" and PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PRAX (target: $544) vs -4.6% for AUPH (target: $16).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.50 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | 0.0% |
AUPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AUPH vs PRAX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUPH or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AUPH or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) delivered a total return of +31. 6%, compared to -18. 4% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AUPH returned +552. 4% versus PRAX's -19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AUPH or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 80% more volatile than AUPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AUPH or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AUPH or PRAX?
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUPH leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AUPH or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 61.
1% to $544. 40.
07Which pays a better dividend — AUPH or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AUPH or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), +552. 4% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUPH: +552. 4%, PRAX: -19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AUPH and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.