Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $13.91B | $7.22B | $2M | $117M | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $2.01B | $76M | $55M | $185M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-831M | $-4.11B | $-234M | $-68M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | 48.3% | -21.3% | 23.4% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -233.5% | -209.5% | -332.8% | -123.0% | -37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.4x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $157M | $0.00 | $535M | $65M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $1.84B | $83M | $9M | $67M |
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora Innovation, … (AUR) | 100 | 346.6 | +246.6% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 196.1 | +96.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -28.6% 10Y total return vs MBLY's -69.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 11.86x
MBLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.80
- Beta 1.80, current ratio 6.10x
- Beta 1.80 vs OUST's 3.51
Among these 5 stocks, LAZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INVZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs AUR's -3.3%
OUST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -30.1% margin vs AUR's -207.8%
- +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4%
- -15.9% ROA vs LAZR's -81.0%, ROIC -30.2% vs -123.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 127.0% revenue growth vs AUR's -3.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -30.1% margin vs AUR's -207.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.80 vs OUST's 3.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.9% ROA vs LAZR's -81.0%, ROIC -30.2% vs -123.6% |
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OUST leads in 1 of 6 categories
AUR leads 0 • MBLY leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • INVZ leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 503.5x AUR's $4M. OUST is the more profitable business, keeping -30.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUR's -207.8%. On growth, INVZ holds the edge at +110.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $2.0B | $76M | $55M | $185M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$903M | -$3.8B | -$229M | -$62M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$831M | -$4.1B | -$234M | -$68M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$646M | $482M | -$209M | -$52M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +48.3% | -21.3% | +23.4% | +49.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -233.5% | -2.1% | -3.3% | -123.0% | -37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -207.8% | -2.0% | -3.1% | -123.1% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -161.5% | +23.9% | -2.8% | -94.4% | -37.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.4% | +21.0% | +110.3% | +48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | -35.0% | -2.6% | +9.1% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBLY and LAZR and OUST each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.9B | $7.2B | $2M | $117M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.8B | $5.4B | $454M | $173M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.23x | -18.48x | -0.01x | -2.04x | -22.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.38x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 69.97x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4636.46x | 3.81x | 0.03x | 2.13x | 9.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.14x | 0.61x | — | 1.78x | 5.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.81x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MBLY and OUST each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OUST delivers a -22.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-22 in annual profit, vs $-87 for INVZ. OUST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVZ's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -39.6% | -37.3% | — | -87.2% | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.9% | -35.5% | -81.0% | -49.0% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.0% | -3.2% | -123.6% | -46.9% | -30.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.3% | -3.6% | -118.7% | -64.1% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — | — | 0.83x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$65M | -$1.8B | $452M | $56M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $1.8B | $83M | $9M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $157M | $0 | $535M | $65M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -3.73x | -39.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AUR and OUST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AUR five years ago would be worth $7,140 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +196.7% total return vs LAZR's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 76.5% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.5% | -21.0% | -24.1% | -28.1% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -39.9% | -98.4% | -3.9% | +196.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +392.4% | -77.3% | -99.9% | -72.8% | +449.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | -69.4% | -100.0% | -93.0% | -76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | -69.4% | -100.0% | -92.9% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +70.1% | -39.0% | -91.4% | -35.2% | +76.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AUR and MBLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBLY is the less volatile stock with a 1.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 1.80x | 2.40x | 2.69x | 3.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.19 | $20.18 | $4.82 | $2.54 | $41.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.60 | $6.47 | $0.05 | $0.58 | $8.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +44.0% | +1.3% | +27.3% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.0 | 65.5 | 36.2 | 59.9 | 67.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.9M | 6.2M | 418K | 2.4M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AUR as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy", INVZ as "Buy", OUST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 188.6% upside for INVZ (target: $2) vs -30.0% for AUR (target: $5).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $14.44 | — | $2.00 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 26 | — | 5 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OUST leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 4 categories are tied.
AUR vs MBLY vs LAZR vs INVZ vs OUST: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Analysts rate Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST?
Over the past 5 years, Aurora Innovation, Inc.
(AUR) delivered a total return of -28. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AUR returned -28. 6% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mobileye Global Inc.
(MBLY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 80β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 51β — meaning OUST is approximately 94% more volatile than MBLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ouster, Inc. (OUST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 83% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Aurora Innovation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST?
Mobileye Global Inc.
(MBLY) is the more profitable company, earning -20. 7% net margin versus -272. 0% for Aurora Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps -20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBLY leads at -23. 2% versus -300. 3% for AUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OUST leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVZ: 188.
6% to $2. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AUR or MBLY or LAZR or INVZ or OUST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mobileye Global Inc.
(MBLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MBLY: -69. 4%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AUR and MBLY and LAZR and INVZ and OUST?
These companies operate in different sectors (AUR (Technology) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical) and OUST (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AUR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.