Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AUST vs CDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
AUST vs CDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $18M | $11.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $799M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $573K | $554M |
AUST vs CDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Gold Corp. (AUST) | 100 | 77.3 | -22.7% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 465.7 | +365.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AUST vs CDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AUST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.47
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, current ratio 25.02x
- Beta 1.47, current ratio 25.02x
CDE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 149.9% 10Y total return vs AUST's -69.6%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs AUST's 47.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs AUST's 47.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.1% margin vs AUST's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.47 vs CDE's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.1% vs AUST's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs AUST's -18.4%, ROIC 23.5% vs -16.0% |
AUST vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AUST vs CDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE and AUST operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +31.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.9% | +4.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AUST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $11.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.08x | 20.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.16x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-19 for AUST. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDE scores 6/9 vs AUST's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.4% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.2% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$572,691 | -$188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $572,691 | $554M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 47.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDE five years ago would be worth $19,605 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,043 for AUST. Over the past 12 months, CDE leads with a +216.1% total return vs AUST's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs AUST's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.6% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +216.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.7% | +414.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +96.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +149.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +72.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AUST and CDE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUST is the less volatile stock with a 1.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDE currently trades 65.2% from its 52-week high vs AUST's 33.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.92 | $27.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $5.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.9% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 134K | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
CDE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AUST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AUST vs CDE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AUST or CDE a better buy right now?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AUST or CDE?
Over the past 5 years, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) delivered a total return of +96. 0%, compared to -69. 6% for Austin Gold Corp. (AUST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDE returned +149. 9% versus AUST's -69. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AUST or CDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Austin Gold Corp.
(AUST) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 47β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 23% more volatile than AUST relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AUST or CDE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc.
grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 47. 8% for Austin Gold Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AUST or CDE?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Austin Gold Corp. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 0. 0% for AUST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDE leads at 39. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AUST or CDE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AUST or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Austin Gold Corp.
(AUST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUST: -69. 6%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AUST and CDE?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AUST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.