Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AVBC vs EFSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
AVBC vs EFSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $404M | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $148M | $912M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $288M | $509M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $208M |
Quick Verdict: AVBC vs EFSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AVBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.59
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 75.9%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.59, current ratio 0.02x
EFSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 9.9%
- 153.5% 10Y total return vs AVBC's 37.9%
- NIM 3.6% vs AVBC's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% NII/revenue growth vs AVBC's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 15.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AVBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs EFSC's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs EFSC's +15.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AVBC's 0.6% |
AVBC vs EFSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFSC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFSC is the larger business by revenue, generating $912M annually — 6.2x AVBC's $148M. EFSC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVBC's -2.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $912M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $291M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $182M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +68.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | +13.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVBC and EFSC each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $404M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $676M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -111.89x | 11.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.37x | 10.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EFSC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EFSC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-1 for AVBC. EFSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVBC's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EFSC scores 6/9 vs AVBC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.2% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $272M | $300M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $208M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $288M | $509M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AVBC and EFSC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVBC five years ago would be worth $13,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,808 for EFSC. Over the past 12 months, AVBC leads with a +37.9% total return vs EFSC's +15.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EFSC at 17.9% vs AVBC's 11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | +10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.9% | +15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +28.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +153.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVBC and EFSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EFSC's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.43 | $62.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $50.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 269K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
EFSC is the only dividend payer here at 2.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
EFSC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
AVBC vs EFSC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVBC or EFSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the stronger pick with 12.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC). Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVBC or EFSC?
On forward P/E, Enterprise Financial Services Corp is actually cheaper at 10.
7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVBC or EFSC?
Over the past 5 years, Avidia Bancorp, Inc.
(AVBC) delivered a total return of +37. 9%, compared to +28. 1% for Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EFSC returned +153. 5% versus AVBC's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVBC or EFSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avidia Bancorp, Inc.
(AVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Enterprise Financial Services Corp's 0. 90β — meaning EFSC is approximately 50% more volatile than AVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 76% for Avidia Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVBC or EFSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is pulling ahead at 12.
0% versus 4. 9% for Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enterprise Financial Services Corp grew EPS 9. 9% year-over-year, compared to -131. 6% for Avidia Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVBC or EFSC?
Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
1% net margin versus -2. 2% for Avidia Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFSC leads at 31. 1% versus -3. 9% for AVBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EFSC leads at 68. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVBC or EFSC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) trades at 10.
7x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Avidia Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVBC or EFSC?
In this comparison, EFSC (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AVBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVBC or EFSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 2. 0% yield, +153. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFSC: +153. 5%, AVBC: +37. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVBC and EFSC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AVBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EFSC is a small-cap deep-value stock. EFSC pays a dividend while AVBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.