Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $86M | $46M | $225M | $223M | $5.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $523M | $51M | $353M | $428M | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $4M | $47M | $19M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 29.2% | 84.4% | 96.7% | 99.6% | 98.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 11.0% | 50.5% | 60.8% | 47.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 13.3x | 8.0x | 4.2x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $6M | $316M | $3.51B | $6.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $21M | $202M | $6M | $501M |
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Vanguard C… (AVD) | 100 | 22.6 | -77.4% |
| Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Consumer Portfolio … (CPSS) | 100 | 401.2 | +301.2% |
| Credit Acceptance C… (CACC) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, AVD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HGBL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.66 vs CACC's 1.61, lower leverage
MFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Rev growth 21.1%, EPS growth 17.1%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AVD's -5.9%
CPSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.14 vs CACC's 1.15
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.14 vs 1.15
- +12.6% vs HGBL's -32.8%
CACC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 184.8% 10Y total return vs HGBL's 6.4%
- NIM 17.8% vs HGBL's 0.2%
- 18.3% margin vs AVD's -8.7%
- 5.1% ROA vs AVD's -7.1%, ROIC 10.4% vs 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AVD's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.14 vs 1.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs AVD's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CACC's 1.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AVD's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.6% vs HGBL's -32.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs AVD's -7.1%, ROIC 10.4% vs 1.3% |
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPSS leads in 1 of 6 categories
MFIN leads 1 • AVD leads 0 • HGBL leads 0 • CACC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPSS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CACC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 45.5x HGBL's $51M. CACC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVD's -8.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $523M | $51M | $353M | $428M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $7M | $111M | $88M | $579M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $4M | $47M | $19M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | -$2M | $126M | $288M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +84.4% | +96.7% | +99.6% | +98.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +11.0% | +50.5% | +60.8% | +47.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +7.0% | +12.2% | +4.5% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | -4.6% | +35.7% | +67.5% | +45.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | — | +16.3% | 0.0% | +43.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AVD and CPSS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 61% valuation discount to CACC's 13.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CPSS offers better value at 0.14x vs CACC's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $86M | $46M | $225M | $223M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $31M | $340M | $3.7B | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.71x | 13.30x | 5.37x | 12.84x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.89x | — | 7.97x | 4.19x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.14x | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.45x | 4.65x | 1.90x | 14.27x | 9.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.91x | 0.64x | 0.52x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.70x | 0.46x | 0.80x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 1.78x | 0.77x | 5.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HGBL and CACC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CACC delivers a 29.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-22 for AVD. HGBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPSS's 11.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CACC scores 8/9 vs CPSS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.9% | +5.4% | +9.4% | +6.3% | +29.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.1% | +4.1% | +1.6% | +0.5% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +6.0% | +17.2% | +5.4% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +8.0% | +10.0% | +7.1% | +14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.09x | 0.62x | 11.33x | 4.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | -$15M | $115M | $3.5B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $21M | $202M | $6M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $6M | $316M | $3.5B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 41.70x | 1.07x | 0.38x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MFIN and CPSS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPSS five years ago would be worth $23,884 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,664 for AVD. Over the past 12 months, CPSS leads with a +12.6% total return vs HGBL's -32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 16.7% vs AVD's -44.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.3% | +8.1% | -4.9% | +12.0% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.4% | -32.8% | +8.2% | +12.6% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.9% | -53.5% | +58.9% | -0.5% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | -57.4% | +23.2% | +138.8% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +639.3% | +60.3% | +176.1% | +184.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.5% | -22.5% | +16.7% | -0.2% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HGBL and CPSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HGBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CACC's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPSS currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs AVD's 50.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.66x | 1.15x | 0.70x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.92 | $2.32 | $11.00 | $10.46 | $565.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.05 | $1.13 | $7.88 | $6.67 | $401.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.7% | +57.3% | +86.9% | +98.2% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 45.0 | 55.0 | 80.4 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 364K | 66K | 59K | 22K | 179K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVD as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", CPSS as "Buy", CACC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 466.7% upside for AVD (target: $17) vs 3.3% for CACC (target: $540). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs AVD's 2.94%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — | — | — | $540.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | — | 9 | 4 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — | +4.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | $0.45 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +5.7% | +0.4% | +3.9% | 0.0% |
CPSS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MFIN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
AVD vs HGBL vs MFIN vs CPSS vs CACC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation at 13. 9x. On forward P/E, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. wins at 0. 14x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
Over the past 5 years, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
(CPSS) delivered a total return of +138. 8%, compared to -83. 4% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HGBL returned +639. 3% versus AVD's -71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heritage Global Inc.
(HGBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 61β — meaning CACC is approximately 143% more volatile than HGBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 11% for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -5. 9% for American Vanguard Corporation (AVD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Credit Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 88. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 6% for Heritage Global Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -9. 7% for American Vanguard Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPSS leads at 60. 8% versus 1. 3% for AVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPSS leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. (CPSS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 14x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. (CPSS) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 3x for Credit Acceptance Corporation — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVD: 466. 7% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), AVD (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. HGBL, CPSS, CACC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AVD or HGBL or MFIN or CPSS or CACC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heritage Global Inc.
(HGBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +639. 3% 10Y return). Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HGBL: +639. 3%, CACC: +184. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AVD and HGBL and MFIN and CPSS and CACC?
These companies operate in different sectors (AVD (Basic Materials) and HGBL (Financial Services) and MFIN (Financial Services) and CPSS (Financial Services) and CACC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AVD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HGBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CPSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CACC is a small-cap deep-value stock. AVD, MFIN pay a dividend while HGBL, CPSS, CACC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.