Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AVO vs CVGW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$964M
5Y Perf.+3.2%
CVGW
Calavo Growers, Inc.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$500M
5Y Perf.-58.3%

AVO vs CVGW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AVO logoAVO
CVGW logoCVGW
IndustryFood DistributionFood Distribution
Market Cap$964M$500M
Revenue (TTM)$1.34B$616M
Net Income (TTM)$33M$18M
Gross Margin12.0%10.2%
Operating Margin4.8%2.1%
Forward P/E20.6x19.9x
Total Debt$201M$23M
Cash & Equiv.$65M$61M

AVO vs CVGWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AVO
CVGW
StockOct 20May 26Return
Mission Produce, In… (AVO)100103.2+3.2%
Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW)10041.7-58.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AVO vs CVGW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CVGW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Mission Produce, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
The Income Pick

AVO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32
  • Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
  • -1.4% 10Y total return vs CVGW's -34.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CVGW
Calavo Growers, Inc.
The Value Play

CVGW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (19.9x vs 20.6x)
  • 2.9% margin vs AVO's 2.5%
  • 2.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAVO logoAVO12.7% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0%
ValueCVGW logoCVGWLower P/E (19.9x vs 20.6x)
Quality / MarginsCVGW logoCVGW2.9% margin vs AVO's 2.5%
Stability / SafetyAVO logoAVOBeta 0.32 vs CVGW's 0.44
DividendsCVGW logoCVGW2.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AVO logoAVO+31.2% vs CVGW's +9.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CVGW logoCVGW5.8% ROA vs AVO's 3.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.2%

AVO vs CVGW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AVOMission Produce, Inc.
FY 2025
Avocado
85.9%$1.2B
Blueberry
6.7%$93M
Mango
6.2%$86M
Other
1.2%$16M
CVGWCalavo Growers, Inc.
FY 2025
Fresh products
100.0%$577M

AVO vs CVGW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAVOLAGGINGCVGW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AVO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.2x CVGW's $616M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (CVGW) to 2.5% (AVO). On growth, AVO holds the edge at -16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$616M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$91M$19M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$38M$15M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+12.0%+10.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.8%+2.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.5%+2.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.9%+2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.6%-20.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-118.2%-84.0%
AVO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AVO and CVGW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 25.2x trailing earnings, CVGW trades at a 2% valuation discount to AVO's 25.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVO's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVGW's 17.1x.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
Market CapShares × price$964M$500M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$463M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS25.68x25.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.62x19.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.87x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.37x17.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.69x0.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.57x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.92x25.81x
Evenly matched — AVO and CVGW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CVGW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CVGW delivers a 8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for AVO. CVGW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVO's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGW scores 7/9 vs AVO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.5%+8.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.3%+5.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.2%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.32x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$136M-$38M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$65M$61M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$201M$23M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.85x42.51x
CVGW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AVO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AVO five years ago would be worth $7,037 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,027 for CVGW. Over the past 12 months, AVO leads with a +31.2% total return vs CVGW's +9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVO at 4.5% vs CVGW's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.5%+31.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.2%+9.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.2%-3.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-29.6%-59.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.4%-34.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.5%-1.1%
AVO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AVO and CVGW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AVO is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVGW's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVGW currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs AVO's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x0.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.53$28.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.00$18.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.6%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.957.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded918K284K
Evenly matched — AVO and CVGW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AVO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates AVO as "Buy" and CVGW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.6% upside for AVO (target: $19) vs -3.6% for CVGW (target: $27). CVGW is the only dividend payer here at 2.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAVO logoAVOMission Produce, …CVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts610
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+0.0%
AVO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AVO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CVGW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallMission Produce, Inc. (AVO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AVO vs CVGW: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AVO or CVGW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (19. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AVO or CVGW?

On trailing P/E, Calavo Growers, Inc.

(CVGW) is the cheapest at 25. 2x versus Mission Produce, Inc. at 25. 7x. On forward P/E, Calavo Growers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AVO or CVGW?

Over the past 5 years, Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) delivered a total return of -29. 6%, compared to -59. 7% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVO returned -1. 4% versus CVGW's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AVO or CVGW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Calavo Growers, Inc. 's 0. 44β — meaning CVGW is approximately 38% more volatile than AVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 32% for Mission Produce, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AVO or CVGW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mission Produce, Inc.

(AVO) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calavo Growers, Inc. grew EPS 1950% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Mission Produce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVO leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AVO or CVGW?

Calavo Growers, Inc.

(CVGW) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for Mission Produce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVO leads at 5. 1% versus 3. 0% for CVGW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVO leads at 11. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AVO or CVGW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Calavo Growers, Inc.

(CVGW) trades at 19. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for Mission Produce, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 39. 6% to $19. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AVO or CVGW?

In this comparison, CVGW (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AVO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AVO or CVGW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Calavo Growers, Inc.

(CVGW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVGW: -34. 9%, AVO: -1. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AVO and CVGW?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CVGW pays a dividend while AVO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AVO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVGW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AVO and CVGW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AVO: -16.6% · CVGW: -20.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(AVO: 2.5% · CVGW: 2.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AVO: 25.7x · CVGW: 25.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.