Waste Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Waste Management
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $10M | $1.59B | $15.04B | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $2.24B | $6.06B | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $585K | $-171M | $395M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 19.2% | 30.0% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 1.0% | 11.2% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 30.7x | — | 33.4x | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $1.81B | $3.45B | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $104M | $826M | $124M |
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon Holdings Cor… (AWX) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
| Enviri Corporation (NVRI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) | 100 | 474.9 | +374.9% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AWX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs CLH's 1.36
- Lower P/E (30.7x vs 63.9x)
NVRI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.
- 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +170.5% vs CWST's -28.9%
CLH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 6.5% margin vs NVRI's -7.6%
- 5.2% ROA vs NVRI's -6.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 3.3%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs CLH's 496.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs NVRI's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.7x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs NVRI's -7.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs NVRI's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.5% vs CWST's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs NVRI's -6.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 3.3% |
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories
AWX leads 1 • NVRI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 71.2x AWX's $85M. CLH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVRI's -7.6%. On growth, AWX holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $2.2B | $6.1B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $204M | $1.1B | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $585,000 | -$171M | $395M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$40M | $467M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +19.2% | +30.0% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +1.0% | +11.2% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -7.6% | +6.5% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -1.8% | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | -0.4% | +1.9% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.8% | -1.9% | +9.2% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AWX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.7x trailing earnings, AWX trades at a 96% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AWX offers better value at 0.35x vs CLH's 1.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $1.6B | $15.0B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $3.3B | $17.7B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.74x | -9.23x | 38.74x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 33.43x | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | — | 1.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.97x | 12.15x | 15.73x | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.71x | 2.49x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 5.24x | 5.48x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.80x | — | 34.04x | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NVRI. CWST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVRI's 6.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWX scores 6/9 vs NVRI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | -43.7% | +14.4% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -6.2% | +5.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +3.3% | +9.8% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +4.2% | +10.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 6.11x | 1.26x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $1.7B | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $104M | $826M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $1.8B | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | -0.10x | 6.34x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLH five years ago would be worth $29,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,610 for AWX. Over the past 12 months, NVRI leads with a +170.5% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLH at 27.3% vs CWST's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +7.3% | +15.9% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | +170.5% | +26.7% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | +105.2% | +106.2% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | -14.8% | +198.8% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +191.4% | +496.4% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | +27.1% | +27.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWX and NVRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVRI's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVRI currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs AWX's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 1.18x | 0.70x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.43 | $19.98 | $316.98 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $6.87 | $201.34 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.6% | +96.1% | +89.0% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 49.3 | 37.9 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 1.1M | 504K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AWX and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVRI as "Buy", CLH as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for CWST (target: $119) vs 6.1% for CLH (target: $299).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | $299.33 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 27 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AWX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AWX vs NVRI vs CLH vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Enviri Corporation (NVRI). Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) offers the better valuation at 30. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enviri Corporation (NVRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
On trailing P/E, Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the cheapest at 30.
7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) delivered a total return of +198. 8%, compared to -43. 9% for Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus AWX's +29. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avalon Holdings Corporation (AWX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Enviri Corporation's 1. 18β — meaning NVRI is approximately -1084% more volatile than AWX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 79% versus 6% for Enviri Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -4. 3% for Enviri Corporation (NVRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clean Harbors, Inc. grew EPS -1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -75. 8% for Avalon Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -7. 5% for Enviri Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus 2. 4% for AWX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLH leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) trades at 33. 4x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWST: 39. 3% to $119. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AWX or NVRI or CLH or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, NVRI: +191. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AWX and NVRI and CLH and CWST?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AWX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.