Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Information Technology Services
Communication Equipment
Security & Protection Services
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Security & Protection Services | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $32.51B | $6.59B | $2.58B | $63.82B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $1.92B | $9.50B | $11.87B | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $291M | $-568M | $2.09B | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 59.3% | 46.8% | 22.7% | 49.9% | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 22.0% | 9.0% | 24.3% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | 52.5x | 19.2x | 29.6x | 22.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $627M | $18.45B | $9.77B | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.20B | $165M | $2.04B | $1.17B | $454K |
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axon Enterprise, In… (AXON) | 100 | 531.3 | +431.3% |
| MSA Safety Incorpor… (MSA) | 100 | 142.9 | +42.9% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.0 | -39.0% |
| Motorola Solutions,… (MSI) | 100 | 283.7 | +183.7% |
| Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 20.7% 10Y total return vs MSI's 484.3%
- 33.5% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4%
MSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 3.01x
- PEG 1.09 vs MSI's 1.23
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.2%, current ratio 3.01x
VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- +48.3% vs DGLY's -78.7%
MSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.
- 17.6% margin vs DGLY's -59.7%
- Beta 0.22 vs DGLY's 3.66
Among these 5 stocks, DGLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.5% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs DGLY's -59.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs DGLY's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MSI's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.3% vs DGLY's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs DGLY's -42.8%, ROIC 17.9% vs -114.7% |
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSA leads in 1 of 6 categories
MSI leads 1 • VNET leads 1 • AXON leads 0 • DGLY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AXON and MSI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 637.6x DGLY's $19M. MSI is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DGLY's -59.7%. On growth, AXON holds the edge at +33.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.9B | $9.5B | $11.9B | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $496M | $2.8B | $3.2B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | $291M | -$568M | $2.1B | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $309M | -$3.9B | $2.5B | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.3% | +46.8% | +22.7% | +49.9% | +25.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +22.0% | +9.0% | +24.3% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +15.2% | -6.0% | +17.6% | -59.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +16.1% | -40.7% | +21.0% | -57.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | +10.0% | +23.8% | +7.4% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.8% | +21.2% | -2.1% | -13.8% | -84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, MSA trades at a 91% valuation discount to AXON's 267.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSA offers better value at 1.37x vs MSI's 1.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.5B | $6.6B | $2.6B | $63.8B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.2B | $7.1B | $5.0B | $72.4B | $11M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 267.25x | 23.97x | 91.74x | 30.09x | -0.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.50x | 19.21x | 29.61x | 22.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x | — | 1.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1575.65x | 14.89x | 15.34x | 21.39x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.70x | 3.51x | 2.13x | 5.46x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.44x | 4.89x | 2.54x | 26.60x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 433.05x | 22.30x | — | 24.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSI delivers a 89.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $-136 for DGLY. MSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSI's 4.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs DGLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +22.0% | -7.6% | +89.8% | -136.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +11.4% | -1.5% | +11.4% | -42.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +17.9% | +2.4% | +25.6% | -114.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +19.2% | +3.2% | +25.7% | -135.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.46x | 2.67x | 4.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $709M | $462M | $16.4B | $8.6B | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $165M | $2.0B | $1.2B | $454,314 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $627M | $18.4B | $9.8B | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | 12.70x | 1.75x | 12.80x | -3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXON five years ago would be worth $31,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for DGLY. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +48.3% total return vs DGLY's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 43.8% vs DGLY's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.4% | +5.1% | -2.3% | +1.1% | +93.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.2% | +9.2% | +48.3% | -5.3% | -78.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.9% | +30.1% | +197.7% | +39.2% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +212.8% | +7.9% | -63.4% | +101.0% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2074.2% | +290.0% | -37.2% | +484.3% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +9.2% | +43.8% | +11.6% | -94.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSA and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DGLY's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSA currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs DGLY's 17.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.92x | 2.66x | 0.22x | 3.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $885.92 | $208.92 | $14.48 | $492.22 | $7.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $339.01 | $151.10 | $5.15 | $361.32 | $0.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +81.3% | +61.5% | +78.0% | +17.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 52.4 | 52.2 | 43.8 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 210K | 5.7M | 923K | 161K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MSA and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AXON as "Buy", MSA as "Buy", VNET as "Buy", MSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 164.6% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs 29.3% for MSI (target: $497). For income investors, MSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.23% vs MSI's 1.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $653.89 | $222.33 | $23.55 | $496.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 11 | 16 | 34 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | — | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.09 | — | $4.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
MSA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MSI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
AXON vs MSA vs VNET vs MSI vs DGLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) is the stronger pick with 33. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
On trailing P/E, MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is the cheapest at 24.
0x versus Axon Enterprise, Inc. at 267. 2x. On forward P/E, MSA Safety Incorporated is actually cheaper at 19. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MSA Safety Incorporated wins at 1. 09x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 23x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
Over the past 5 years, Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) delivered a total return of +212. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXON returned +20. 7% versus DGLY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Digital Ally, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning DGLY is approximately 1539% more volatile than MSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 4% for Motorola Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) is pulling ahead at 33. 5% versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VNET Group, Inc. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for Axon Enterprise, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXON leads at 32. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 4% net margin versus -101. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSI leads at 25. 1% versus -77. 4% for DGLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXON leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 23x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 52. 5x for Axon Enterprise, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 164. 6% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY?
In this comparison, MSA (1.
2% yield), MSI (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AXON, VNET, DGLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXON or MSA or VNET or MSI or DGLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield, +484. 3% 10Y return). Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSI: +484. 3%, DGLY: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXON and MSA and VNET and MSI and DGLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (AXON (Industrials) and MSA (Industrials) and VNET (Technology) and MSI (Technology) and DGLY (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AXON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DGLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MSA, MSI pay a dividend while AXON, VNET, DGLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.