Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.76B | $9.78B | $8.25B | $1.96T | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $4.04B | $3.68B | $68.28B | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $361M | $339M | $24.97B | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 12.7% | 41.1% | 45.9% | 67.1% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -24.9% | 9.4% | 11.2% | 40.9% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 3831.1x | 13.8x | 13.7x | 36.5x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $66M | $1.20B | $1.55B | $65.14B | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $1.16B | $1.22B | $16.18B | $7.84B |
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXT, Inc. (AXTI) | 100 | 2199.6 | +2099.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
| Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1476.1 | +1376.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 270.9 | +170.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AXTI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 33.6% 10Y total return vs AVGO's 29.0%
- +83.7% vs SWKS's +1.5%
SWKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
QRVO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 3.24x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 18.8x)
- Beta 1.31 vs AXTI's 4.18
AVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.9%, EPS growth 287.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- PEG 0.73 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 23.9% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1%
- 36.6% margin vs AXTI's -24.1%
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.4% ROA vs AXTI's -5.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.9% revenue growth vs AXTI's -11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.6% margin vs AXTI's -24.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs AXTI's 4.18 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.7% vs SWKS's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs AXTI's -5.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -6.0% |
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVGO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • AXTI leads 1 • QRVO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 773.1x AXTI's $88M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXTI's -24.1%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $4.0B | $3.7B | $68.3B | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $842M | $607M | $38.8B | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $361M | $339M | $25.0B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $697M | $680M | $28.9B | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +41.1% | +45.9% | +67.1% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.9% | +9.4% | +11.2% | +40.9% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.1% | +8.9% | +9.2% | +36.6% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | +17.2% | +18.5% | +42.3% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | -1.0% | -7.0% | +29.5% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | -44.2% | -3.0% | +31.6% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 1.73x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $9.8B | $8.2B | $1.96T | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $9.8B | $8.6B | $2.00T | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -221.27x | 21.12x | 24.58x | 86.49x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3831.10x | 13.79x | 13.66x | 36.45x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.73x | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.20x | 20.85x | 58.52x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 53.94x | 2.39x | 2.24x | 30.62x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.23x | 1.75x | 2.49x | 24.63x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.85x | 12.14x | 72.67x | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AXTI. AXTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRVO scores 8/9 vs AXTI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | +6.3% | +9.7% | +32.9% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +4.6% | +5.6% | +14.9% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | +6.3% | +8.1% | +14.9% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | +7.0% | +8.0% | +16.9% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.21x | 0.46x | 0.80x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$63M | $42M | $330M | $49.0B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $16.2B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $66M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $65.1B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.48x | 14.46x | 6.34x | 9.24x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXTI five years ago would be worth $112,236 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, AXTI leads with a +8370.3% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXTI at 2.3% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +546.9% | +2.1% | +3.1% | +18.9% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8370.3% | +1.5% | +24.8% | +102.6% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3420.1% | -30.3% | -5.5% | +566.4% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1022.4% | -55.5% | -51.7% | +833.6% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3363.9% | +31.2% | +95.0% | +2897.3% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | -11.4% | -1.9% | +88.2% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AXTI and QRVO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QRVO is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXTI's 4.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXTI currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.06x | 1.30x | 1.26x | 1.96x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.80 | $90.90 | $106.30 | $437.68 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $51.92 | $69.31 | $198.43 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +71.6% | +83.7% | +94.3% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.9 | 55.9 | 56.4 | 68.0 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.3M | 3.3M | 1.2M | 23.3M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AXTI as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", QRVO as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -51.7% for AXTI (target: $52). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs AVGO's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.40 | $62.75 | $85.29 | $443.72 | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 59 | 42 | 58 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.3% | — | +0.6% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | — | 16 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.79 | — | $2.30 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +6.5% | +0.3% | +4.1% |
AVGO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AXTI vs SWKS vs QRVO vs AVGO vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXT, Inc. (AXTI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Qorvo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, AXT, Inc.
(AXTI) delivered a total return of +1022%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXTI returned +36. 2% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qorvo, Inc.
(QRVO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus AXT, Inc. 's 4. 06β — meaning AXTI is approximately 223% more volatile than QRVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus -11. 1% for AXT, Inc. (AXTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to -81. 5% for AXT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
Broadcom Inc.
(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -24. 1% for AXT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -24. 9% for AXTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 3831. 1x for AXT, Inc. — 3817. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), QCOM (1. 7% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. AXTI, QRVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AXTI or SWKS or QRVO or AVGO or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). AXT, Inc. (AXTI) carries a higher beta of 4. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +33. 9%, AXTI: +36. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AXTI and SWKS and QRVO and AVGO and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AXTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QRVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SWKS, AVGO, QCOM pay a dividend while AXTI, QRVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.