Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Asset Management
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Asset Management | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Asset Management | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $16M | $243M | $3.01B | $199M | $930M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $97M | $777M | $40M | $735M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-12M | $-29M | $28M | $9M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 83.5% | 89.4% | 18.0% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | -13.9% | 77.9% | -5.5% | -4.0% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x | 24.1x | 6.1x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $469M | $41M | $473M | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $20M | $128M | $106M | $159M |
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AYTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +104.1% vs HRZN's -23.2%
TPVG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 7.4% vs HRZN's 7.1%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AYTU's 1.8%
- 50.6% margin vs AYTU's -39.0%
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
HRZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 7.6%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
PCRX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 65.6%, current ratio 4.54x
- Beta 0.47 vs AYTU's 1.27, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AYTU's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs AYTU's -39.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs AYTU's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.1% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs AYTU's -20.0%, ROIC -0.2% vs -33.5% |
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUPN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HRZN leads 2 • AYTU leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • PCRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUPN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUPN is the larger business by revenue, generating $777M annually — 19.4x HRZN's $40M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AYTU's -39.0%. On growth, SUPN holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $97M | $777M | $40M | $735M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$22M | $29M | $19M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$12M | -$29M | $28M | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$698,000 | $35M | $82M | $67M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +83.5% | +89.4% | +18.0% | +60.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | +77.9% | -5.5% | -4.0% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.0% | +50.6% | -3.7% | -6.6% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -58.7% | +10.6% | +141.5% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | — | +38.6% | — | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -2.3% | +81.0% | -29.6% | -30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 97% valuation discount to PCRX's 147.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $243M | $3.0B | $199M | $930M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $691M | $2.9B | $567M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.14x | 4.91x | -76.88x | 4.30x | 147.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.50x | 24.12x | 6.10x | 8.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.13x | 53.44x | — | 9.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 2.50x | 4.19x | 4.97x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.68x | 2.78x | 0.60x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 65.45x | 3.51x | 6.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPVG and SUPN and HRZN and PCRX each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-172 for AYTU. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs AYTU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -172.1% | -3.4% | -2.7% | +9.0% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | -1.5% | -2.0% | +3.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.5% | +7.2% | -2.8% | -0.2% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.3% | +9.4% | -3.4% | -0.2% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 1.33x | 0.04x | 1.49x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $449M | -$87M | $368M | $296M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $20M | $128M | $106M | $159M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $469M | $41M | $473M | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.96x | -1.02x | — | 0.60x | 2.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SUPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPN five years ago would be worth $17,801 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $215 for AYTU. Over the past 12 months, AYTU leads with a +104.1% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 12.4% vs PCRX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | -6.3% | +5.7% | -26.7% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.1% | +19.3% | +69.0% | -23.2% | -6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | -3.4% | +42.1% | -27.7% | -44.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -13.5% | +78.0% | -32.8% | -62.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +93.3% | +228.4% | +52.9% | -51.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | -1.2% | +12.4% | -10.3% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SUPN and PCRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AYTU's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.83x | 0.78x | 0.70x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $7.53 | $59.68 | $8.46 | $27.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.20 | $4.48 | $29.16 | $3.80 | $18.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.5% | +79.5% | +87.6% | +53.3% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 58.3 | 57.9 | 58.5 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 504K | 604K | 1.2M | 695K |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", SUPN as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold", PCRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 14.8% for SUPN (target: $60). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs TPVG's 17.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $60.00 | $6.50 | $29.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 14 | 22 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | — | +27.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.02 | — | $1.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +16.0% |
SUPN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HRZN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AYTU vs TPVG vs SUPN vs HRZN vs PCRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 147. 8x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
Over the past 5 years, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) delivered a total return of +78. 0%, compared to -97. 8% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SUPN returned +228. 4% versus AYTU's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Aytu BioPharma, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning AYTU is approximately 172% more volatile than PCRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 1. 8% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. (AYTU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -151. 5% for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCRX leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -20. 4% for Aytu BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -11. 8% for AYTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUPN leads at 89. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 1x for Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AYTU, SUPN, PCRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AYTU or TPVG or SUPN or HRZN or PCRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 27. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +52. 9%, AYTU: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AYTU and TPVG and SUPN and HRZN and PCRX?
These companies operate in different sectors (AYTU (Healthcare) and TPVG (Financial Services) and SUPN (Healthcare) and HRZN (Financial Services) and PCRX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AYTU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG, HRZN pay a dividend while AYTU, SUPN, PCRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.