Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
Software - Infrastructure
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $855M | $520M | $6.91B | $4.08B | $15.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $597M | $351M | $563M | $3.94B | $949M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $88M | $-62M | $-1.39B | $254M |
| Gross Margin | 44.6% | 80.2% | 77.4% | 7.9% | 58.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 42.9% | -14.9% | -9.9% | 16.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.7x | 5.0x | 63.4x | — | 147.2x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $580M | $19M | $193M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $280M | $75M | $77M | $962M | $254M |
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 170.2 | +70.2% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 25.9 | -74.1% |
| DigitalOcean Holdin… (DOCN) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, AZTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CCSI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 147.2x)
- 13.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs -15.8%
FROG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 2.2%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.24, current ratio 2.09x
- 24.1% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs AZTA's -26.5%
DOCN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 254.3% 10Y total return vs FROG's -12.0%
- 26.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 147.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs AZTA's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 22.2% vs -15.8% |
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
DOCN leads 1 • AZTA leads 0 • FROG leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 11.2x CCSI's $351M. DOCN is the more profitable business, keeping 26.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, FROG holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $597M | $351M | $563M | $3.9B | $949M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | $164M | -$66M | -$363M | $315M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | $88M | -$62M | -$1.4B | $254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $112M | $151M | $1.1B | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.6% | +80.2% | +77.4% | +7.9% | +58.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +42.9% | -14.9% | -9.9% | +16.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.9% | +25.1% | -10.9% | -35.2% | +26.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +32.0% | +26.9% | +27.2% | +4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | +1.5% | +25.8% | -37.6% | +22.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +21.5% | +56.3% | -50.0% | -59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCSI and OPEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 89% valuation discount to DOCN's 59.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DOCN's 55.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $855M | $520M | $6.9B | $4.1B | $15.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $687M | $1.0B | $6.9B | $3.3B | $16.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.22x | 6.50x | -91.97x | -3.13x | 59.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.68x | 4.99x | 63.45x | — | 147.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 6.07x | — | — | 54.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 1.49x | 12.99x | 0.93x | 17.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 39.95x | 7.47x | 4.06x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.32x | 4.92x | 48.56x | 3.93x | 92.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. FROG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCN scores 7/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | +52.9% | -7.0% | -163.2% | +165.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.8% | +13.2% | -4.7% | -53.6% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +22.2% | -8.0% | -15.8% | +15.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +26.8% | -9.6% | -11.7% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 42.14x | 0.02x | 0.19x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$169M | $506M | -$57M | -$769M | $476M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $280M | $75M | $77M | $962M | $254M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $580M | $19M | $193M | $731M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.95x | — | -8.92x | 134.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOCN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DOCN five years ago would be worth $35,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,903 for AZTA. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs AZTA's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOCN at 65.5% vs AZTA's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.4% | +30.2% | -4.3% | -12.4% | +207.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.5% | +26.8% | +65.0% | +510.1% | +426.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -21.8% | +165.6% | +159.5% | +353.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -20.6% | +58.8% | -71.6% | +256.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | -20.6% | -12.0% | -50.8% | +254.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | -7.9% | +38.5% | +37.4% | +65.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FROG and DOCN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FROG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DOCN currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs AZTA's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.51x | 1.24x | 3.09x | 2.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.73 | $31.66 | $70.43 | $10.87 | $162.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.11 | $19.24 | $33.74 | $0.51 | $25.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.5% | +89.3% | +81.0% | +48.9% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 51.0 | 67.3 | 56.2 | 85.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 123K | 2.7M | 36.3M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CCSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AZTA as "Buy", CCSI as "Buy", FROG as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", DOCN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.5% upside for AZTA (target: $45) vs -46.1% for DOCN (target: $81).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.67 | $25.00 | $68.71 | $6.50 | $81.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 6 | 22 | 26 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOCN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AZTA vs CCSI vs FROG vs OPEN vs DOCN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. at 59. 8x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
Over the past 5 years, DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
(DOCN) delivered a total return of +256. 0%, compared to -81. 0% for Azenta, Inc. (AZTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOCN returned +254. 3% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 150% more volatile than FROG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 183. 1% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FROG leads at 23. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
(DOCN) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -15. 7% for FROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 147. 2x for DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. — 142. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AZTA: 140. 5% to $44. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AZTA or CCSI or FROG or OPEN or DOCN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FROG: -12. 0%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AZTA and CCSI and FROG and OPEN and DOCN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AZTA (Healthcare) and CCSI (Technology) and FROG (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and DOCN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AZTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FROG is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCN is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.