Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BAC vs C
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
BAC vs C — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $407.94B | $222.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.75B | $170.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30.63B | $14.69B |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $365.90B | $590.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $231.84B | $276.53B |
BAC vs C — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 222.2 | +122.2% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 266.3 | +166.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAC vs C
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.4%
- 332.5% 10Y total return vs C's 229.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.42x
C carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 47.3%
- NIM 2.3% vs BAC's 1.8%
- 9.9% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BAC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs C's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs C's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.1% vs BAC's +33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BAC's 0.4% |
BAC vs C — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAC vs C — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAC and C operate at a comparable scale, with $188.8B and $170.7B in trailing revenue. BAC is the more profitable business, keeping 16.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to C's 7.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.8B | $170.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36.6B | $24.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30.6B | $14.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.6B | -$76.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | +23.2% |
Valuation Metrics
C leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 35% valuation discount to C's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BAC's 14.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than C's 25.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $407.9B | $222.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $542.0B | $537.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.03x | 21.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.05x | 11.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.80x | 25.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.16x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.34x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BAC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for C. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to C's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs C's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 2.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $134.1B | $314.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $231.8B | $276.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $365.9B | $590.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
C leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in C five years ago would be worth $18,509 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,887 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, C leads with a +87.1% total return vs BAC's +33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors C at 42.6% vs BAC's 27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.7% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.9% | +87.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.6% | +189.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | +85.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +332.5% | +229.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.0% | +42.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAC and C each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.55 | $135.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.56 | $69.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36.3M | 11.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BAC as "Buy" and C as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.0% upside for BAC (target: $61) vs 10.1% for C (target: $140). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.36% vs C's 2.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.13 | $140.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +3.4% |
BAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). C leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
BAC vs C: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAC or C a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank of America Corporation (BAC) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAC or C?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Citigroup Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Citigroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAC or C?
Over the past 5 years, Citigroup Inc.
(C) delivered a total return of +85. 1%, compared to +38. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAC returned +332. 5% versus C's +229. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAC or C?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Citigroup Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning C is approximately 52% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 3% for Citigroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAC or C?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citigroup Inc.
(C) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citigroup Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to 18. 6% for Bank of America Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAC or C?
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
2% net margin versus 7. 4% for Citigroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BAC leads at 18. 5% versus 10. 0% for C. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAC leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAC or C more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Citigroup Inc.
(C) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Bank of America Corporation — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAC: 14. 0% to $61. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAC or C?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 1% for Citigroup Inc. (C).
09Is BAC or C better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 2. 4% yield, +332. 5% 10Y return). Citigroup Inc. (C) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +332. 5%, C: +229. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAC and C?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; C is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.