Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • PE
Market Cap$25.51B
5Y Perf.+133.3%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • ZA
Market Cap$40.19B
5Y Perf.+481.6%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$125.72B
5Y Perf.+94.1%
ITUB
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$90.15B
5Y Perf.+157.2%

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BAP logoBAP
GFI logoGFI
NEM logoNEM
ITUB logoITUB
IndustryBanks - RegionalGoldGoldBanks - Regional
Market Cap$25.51B$40.19B$125.72B$90.15B
Revenue (TTM)$27.00B$10.92B$17.23B$384.58B
Net Income (TTM)$6.47B$2.54B$5.26B$44.86B
Gross Margin64.2%43.1%52.1%34.5%
Operating Margin29.0%43.2%49.3%13.1%
Forward P/E3.4x7.6x10.9x1.7x
Total Debt$37.49B$2.95B$474M$1.01T
Cash & Equiv.$47.51B$860M$7.65B$270.61B

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BAP
GFI
NEM
ITUB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Credicorp Ltd. (BAP)100233.3+133.3%
Gold Fields Limited (GFI)100581.6+481.6%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100194.1+94.1%
Itaú Unibanco Holdi… (ITUB)100257.2+157.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NEM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. GFI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
The Banking Pick

BAP is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 5.5% vs ITUB's 1.2%
Best for: bank quality
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

GFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs NEM's 293.1%
  • 23.4% ROA vs ITUB's 1.5%, ROIC 24.0% vs 3.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Growth Play

NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
  • Beta 0.75, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.72x
  • 19.1% revenue growth vs BAP's 6.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
ITUB
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
The Banking Pick

ITUB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 10.4%
  • PEG 0.08 vs NEM's 0.85
  • Lower P/E (1.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.85
  • 10.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GFI's 0.9%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNEM logoNEM19.1% revenue growth vs BAP's 6.4%
ValueITUB logoITUBLower P/E (1.7x vs 10.9x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.85
Quality / MarginsNEM logoNEM30.5% margin vs ITUB's 11.7%
Stability / SafetyNEM logoNEMBeta 0.75 vs ITUB's 1.11, lower leverage
DividendsITUB logoITUB10.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GFI's 0.9%
Momentum (1Y)NEM logoNEM+112.0% vs ITUB's +44.4%
Efficiency (ROA)GFI logoGFI23.4% ROA vs ITUB's 1.5%, ROIC 24.0% vs 3.2%

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BAPCredicorp Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

GFIGold Fields Limited
FY 2022
Gold
95.3%$4.1B
Copper
4.7%$202M
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B
ITUBItaú Unibanco Holding S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNEMLAGGINGBAP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ITUB is the larger business by revenue, generating $384.6B annually — 35.2x GFI's $10.9B. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITUB's 11.7%. On growth, GFI holds the edge at +64.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$27.0B$10.9B$17.2B$384.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.4B$6.0B$12.7B$57.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6.5B$2.5B$5.3B$44.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.6B$2.0B$12.9B$117.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.2%+43.1%+52.1%+34.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.0%+43.2%+49.3%+13.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.4%+23.2%+30.5%+11.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+49.7%+18.7%+75.0%+33.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.2%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.1%+165.1%-100.0%-11.4%
NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ITUB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, ITUB trades at a 68% valuation discount to GFI's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITUB offers better value at 0.50x vs BAP's 3.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
Market CapShares × price$25.5B$40.2B$125.7B$90.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.6B$42.3B$118.6B$240.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.11x32.54x17.70x10.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.37x7.64x10.89x1.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.08x0.67x1.38x0.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.16x15.54x9.03x20.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.27x7.73x5.69x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.53x7.49x3.69x2.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.59x56.66x17.22x3.48x
ITUB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GFI delivers a 40.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $16 for NEM. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITUB's 4.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs ITUB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.4%+40.6%+15.6%+20.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+23.4%+9.4%+1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.2%+24.0%+24.9%+3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.1%+27.6%+20.7%+2.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98594
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.07x0.55x0.01x4.71x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$10.0B$2.1B-$7.2B$742.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47.5B$860M$7.6B$270.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$37.5B$2.9B$474M$1.01T
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.99x44.58x50.54x0.23x
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GFI five years ago would be worth $46,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,998 for NEM. Over the past 12 months, NEM leads with a +112.0% total return vs ITUB's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFI at 41.6% vs ITUB's 26.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.2%+6.4%+12.4%+14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+66.0%+103.5%+112.0%+44.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+138.9%+183.6%+142.1%+102.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+194.5%+361.9%+80.0%+149.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+181.0%+1086.7%+293.1%+188.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.7%+41.6%+34.3%+26.5%
GFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NEM and ITUB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITUB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITUB currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs GFI's 72.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.86x0.75x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$380.20$61.64$134.88$9.60
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$193.13$19.35$48.27$6.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.6%+72.8%+84.1%+85.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.152.553.542.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded358K3.1M9.2M24.5M
Evenly matched — NEM and ITUB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ITUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BAP as "Hold", GFI as "Hold", NEM as "Buy", ITUB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.9% upside for BAP (target: $408) vs -22.0% for ITUB (target: $6). For income investors, ITUB offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs GFI's 0.87%.

MetricBAP logoBAPCredicorp Ltd.GFI logoGFIGold Fields Limit…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…ITUB logoITUBItaú Unibanco Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$408.00$54.42$137.50$6.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts15183612
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%+0.9%+0.9%+10.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3014
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$46.03$0.39$1.00$4.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+1.8%+0.7%
ITUB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ITUB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallNewmont Corporation (NEM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BAP vs GFI vs NEM vs ITUB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger pick with 19.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (1. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmont Corporation (NEM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

On trailing P/E, Itaú Unibanco Holding S.

A. (ITUB) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Gold Fields Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. is actually cheaper at 1. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. wins at 0. 08x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

Over the past 5 years, Gold Fields Limited (GFI) delivered a total return of +361.

9%, compared to +80. 0% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFI returned +1087% versus BAP's +181. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

75β versus Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. 's 1. 11β — meaning ITUB is approximately 47% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is pulling ahead at 19.

1% versus 6. 4% for Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 0% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

1% net margin versus 11. 7% for Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 13. 1% for ITUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAP leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 85x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) trades at 1. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Newmont Corporation — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAP: 26. 9% to $408. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Itaú Unibanco Holding S. A. (ITUB) offers the highest yield at 10. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Gold Fields Limited (GFI).

09

Is BAP or GFI or NEM or ITUB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

86), 0. 9% yield, +1087% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GFI: +1087%, ITUB: +188. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BAP and GFI and NEM and ITUB?

These companies operate in different sectors (BAP (Financial Services) and GFI (Basic Materials) and NEM (Basic Materials) and ITUB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BAP is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ITUB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BAP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GFI

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ITUB

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BAP and GFI and NEM and ITUB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BAP: 6.4% · GFI: 64.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(BAP: 20.4% · GFI: 23.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BAP: 16.1x · GFI: 32.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.